Literature DB >> 15650648

Carotid endarterectomy remains the standard of care, even in high-risk surgical patients.

Tamer N Boules1, Mary C Proctor, Ahmad Aref, Gilbert R Upchurch, James C Stanley, Peter K Henke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study tested the hypothesis that high-risk patients can undergo carotid endarterectomy without associated increased risk of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or death. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has clearly been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of stroke in selected symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with extracranial carotid stenosis. However, recently, carotid angioplasty with stenting (CAS) has been suggested as an alternative treatment in high-risk surgical patients.
METHODS: Medical records for consecutive patients who underwent CEA from 1996 to 2001 were reviewed for demographics, medical history, and hospital course. High-risk patients were defined as those experiencing a myocardial infarction (MI) or an exacerbation of congestive heart failure (CHF) within 4 weeks before CEA; unstable angina; steroid-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); prior ipsilateral CEA, neck dissection or irradiation; high carotid bifurcation; and those with combined cardiac-carotid procedures. Poor postoperative outcome was defined as stroke, TIA, or death within 30 days. Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used as appropriate.
RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-nine patients underwent 499 CEAs, of which 84 (17%) were considered high risk. The overall stroke-death rate among all patients was 2.8%. A total of 11 postoperative strokes (2.2%), 7 TIAs (1.4%), and 3 deaths (0.6%) occurred within 30 days after surgery. There was no difference in 30-day poor outcome between high- and low-risk patients (4.8% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.77). When these risk factors were assessed independently, those with recent MI were at higher risk for poor outcome (odds ratio [OR], 13.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-82.0; P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis also revealed that a history of contralateral stroke or TIA conferred an increased risk of poor outcome (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.1-8.4; P = 0.02), whereas use of preoperative angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was associated with reduced risk (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.11-1.0; P = 0.05), as was a history of hyperlipidemia (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.87; P = 0.03). By log-rank analysis, 12-month survival was significantly worse in the high-risk group as compared with the low-risk (96% vs. 91%, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients considered a surgical high risk can undergo CEA without any worse outcome compared with those patients deemed low risk. The benefit of CAS will likely be marginal, and only controlled clinical trials will be able to determine if certain subgroups demonstrate improved outcome with CAS. Carotid endarterectomy remains the standard of care, even in high-risk surgical patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15650648      PMCID: PMC1356923          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000150270.86267.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  28 in total

1.  Surgery for carotid artery stenosis following neck irradiation.

Authors:  M L Friedell; B P Joseph; M J Cohen; J D Horowitz
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.466

2.  ACC/AHA Guideline Update for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery--Executive Summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery).

Authors:  Kim A Eagle; Peter B Berger; Hugh Calkins; Bernard R Chaitman; Gordon A Ewy; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Lee A Fleisher; James B Froehlich; Richard J Gusberg; Jeffrey A Leppo; Thomas Ryan; Robert C Schlant; William L Winters; Raymond J Gibbons; Elliott M Antman; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Alice K Jacobs; Loren F Hiratzka; Richard O Russell; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  High-risk carotid endarterectomy: challenges for carotid stent protocols.

Authors:  William D Jordan; Francisco Alcocer; Douglas J Wirthlin; Winfield S Fisher; Julio A Warren; Holt A McDowell; W David Whitley
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Reoperation for carotid stenosis is as safe as primary carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  B B Hill; C Olcott; R L Dalman; E J Harris; C K Zarins
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Preprocedural risk stratification: identifying an appropriate population for carotid stenting.

Authors:  K Ouriel; N R Hertzer; E G Beven; P J O'hara; L P Krajewski; D G Clair; R K Greenberg; T P Sarac; J W Olin; J S Yadav
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Carotid endarterectomy in awake patients with contralateral carotid artery occlusion.

Authors:  R Karmeli; N Lubezky; M Halak; Z Loberman; B Weller; S Fajer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-08

7.  Angioplasty and stenting of the extracranial carotid arteries.

Authors:  M Henry; M Amor; C Klonaris; I Henry; I Masson; Z Chati; E Leborgne; M Hugel
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2000

Review 8.  Carotid artery stent placement for atherosclerotic disease: rationale, technique, and current status.

Authors:  C C Phatouros; R T Higashida; A M Malek; P M Meyers; T E Lempert; C F Dowd; V V Halbach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Hemodynamic benefits of regional anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Yaron Sternbach; Karl A Illig; Renyu Zhang; Cynthia K Shortell; Jeffrey M Rhodes; Mark G Davies; Sean P Lyden; Richard M Green
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Treatment of carotid artery stenosis by elective stent placement instead of carotid endarterectomy in patients with severe coronary artery disease.

Authors:  C M Gross; J Krämer; F Uhlich; C Tamaschke; P Vogel; I Friedrich; R Dietz; J Waigand
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  7 in total

1.  Carotid stenting done exclusively by vascular surgeons: first 175 cases.

Authors:  Mark K Eskandari; G Matthew Longo; Jon S Matsumura; Melina R Kibbe; Mark D Morasch; Kelley R Cardeira; William H Pearce
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Regional variation in carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney; Lori L Travis; David Malenka; Kristen K Bronner; F Lee Lucas; Jack L Cronenwett; David C Goodman; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-12-08

Review 3.  Management of carotid artery disease in the high-risk patient with emphasis on the SAPPHIRE study.

Authors:  Vivek Rajagopal; Jay S Yadav
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Current Progress in EBV-Associated B-Cell Lymphomas.

Authors:  Yonggang Pei; Alexandria E Lewis; Erle S Robertson
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  The early and mid-term results of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Woo-Sung Yun; Woo-Hyung Kwun; Bo-Yang Suh
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2011-04-12

6.  Outcomes after Transverse-Incision 'Mini' Carotid Endarterectomy and Patch-Plasty.

Authors:  Sidhartha Sinha; Matthew Fok; Aaron Goh; Vijay M Gadhvi
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2019-09-30

7.  Quality of life after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Fernando José Abelha; Susana Quevedo; Henrique Barros
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 2.298

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.