Literature DB >> 15650605

Slit-lamp needle revision of failed filtering blebs using high-dose mitomycin C.

Rajesh K Shetty1, Leah Wartluft, Marlene R Moster.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of bleb needle revision with high-dose mitomycin C in reviving failed filtering blebs after 1 year. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 44 patients with one eye that had undergone bleb needle revision with a mixture of 0.1 mL of mitomycin (0.4 mg/mL) mixed with 0.1 mL of non-preserved 1% lidocaine. At least 12 months of follow-up were required. A successful bleb needle revision was defined as one that did not require a subsequent needling, glaucoma surgery, or medication to reach an intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than 4 mm Hg but less than 22 mm Hg. A qualified success was defined as a successful bleb needle revision that required subsequent needling or medication.
RESULTS: The bleb needle revision with high-dose mitomycin was a success or qualified success after 12 months in 28 patients or 64% (95% confidence interval, 50% to 78%). The baseline IOP in these patients was 26.7 +/- 8.2 mm Hg (range 15 to 48 mm Hg) using an average of 1.5 +/- 1.5 glaucoma medications. The IOP after 1 year was 13.6 +/- 4.0 (range 6 to 21 mm Hg) with an average of 0.5 +/- 0.8 medications. Of 44 patients, 17 (39%) were successes and 11 (25%) were qualified successes.
CONCLUSION: Bleb needle revision with high-dose MMC was effective in reducing the IOP in 64% of eyes with a failed filtering bleb with minimal long-term complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15650605     DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000146364.90506.7c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  18 in total

1.  [Late needling with 5-fluorouracil when scarring of filtering bleb seems imminent].

Authors:  M Müller; S Pape; C Kusserow; H Hoerauf; H Laqua
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Long-term outcome of mitomycin C-augmented needle revision of trabeculectomy blebs for late trabeculectomy failure.

Authors:  S Lin; D Byles; M Smith
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Bleb needling outcomes for failed trabeculectomy blebs in Asian eyes: a 2-year follow up.

Authors:  Andrew S H Tsai; Pui Yi Boey; Hla M Htoon; Tina T Wong
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 4.  Mitomycin: clinical applications in ophthalmic practice.

Authors:  Lekha M Abraham; Dinesh Selva; Robert Casson; Igal Leibovitch
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Long-term outcomes of needle revision of failing deep sclerectomy blebs.

Authors:  Antigoni Koukkoulli; Fayyaz Musa; Nitin Anand
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Outcomes of same-site re-operation with minimal use of mitomycin in failed trabeculectomy.

Authors:  Yadollah Eslami; Vafa Samarai; Massood Mohammadi; Ghasem Fakhraie; Reza Zarei; Sajad Eslami; Sasan Moghimi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Office-based slit-lamp needle revision with adjunctive mitomycin-C for late failed or encapsulated filtering blebs.

Authors:  Heidar Amini; Alireza Esmaili; Reza Zarei; Nima Amini; Ramin Daneshvar
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun

8.  Comparison of the outcome of repeat trabeculectomy with adjunctive mitomycin C and initial trabeculectomy.

Authors:  Ali Bulent Cankaya; Ufuk Elgin
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-11-22

9.  Comparison of Subconjunctival Mitomycin C and 5-Fluorouracil Injection for Needle Revision of Early Failed Trabeculectomy Blebs.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Jianrong Wang; Miaomiao Zhang; Yuan Tao; Yan Sun
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Early transconjunctival needling revision with 5-fluorouracil versus medical treatment in encapsulated blebs: a 12-month prospective study.

Authors:  Ricardo Suzuki; Remo Susanna
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.