Literature DB >> 1565050

Ventilatory standards for clinically well aboriginal adults.

J E Thompson1, A C Sleigh, M E Passey, A Barnes, R W Streatfield.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To obtain reference standards for ventilatory function of clinically well Australian Aboriginal adults.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional assessment of the population of a North Queensland Aboriginal community.
SETTING: A specialist clinical and public health service. The measurements were made with the cooperation of the local primary health care centre. PARTICIPANTS: The 288 study subjects included over 70% of Aboriginal adults residing in an isolated Cape York community. Those with known respiratory disease, abnormal chest x-ray findings, positive loose cough sign, abnormal lung signs or inability to perform the ventilatory tests satisfactorily were excluded; 229 persons (80%) remained for analysis. Smoking was prevalent in both men (85%) and women (76%). As in most other studies producing reference values for lung function, smokers were not excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age, standing height in bare feet and sitting height were recorded. Ventilatory measurements included forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) which is also known as the forced expiratory flow (FEF 25%-75%).
RESULTS: Standing height, age and sex were the major determinants of ventilatory function. Sitting height was not a good predictor. Ventilatory values differed significantly from those expected for Europeans: Aboriginal lung volumes were much smaller (by about 25%) and fell much faster with age. The age-related decrease in lung function was less in smokers.
CONCLUSION: The smoking effect may reflect the operation of differential survival or other selective factors and has been noted in some other ethnic groups. Although previous studies have yielded some ventilatory function data on Aborigines, we report the first population-based reference values expected for clinically well adults. The information will be useful to clinicians and public health workers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1565050     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1992.tb121420.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  5 in total

Review 1.  Spirometry.

Authors:  Theodore G Liou; Richard E Kanner
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2009-04-04       Impact factor: 8.667

2.  Comparison of diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) and total lung capacity (TLC) between Indigenous Australians and Australian Caucasian adults.

Authors:  Timothy Howarth; Helmi Ben Saad; Ara J Perez; Charmain B Atos; Elisha White; Subash S Heraganahally
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Spirometry reference equations for central European populations from school age to old age.

Authors:  Mascha K Rochat; Ruediger P Laubender; Daniela Kuster; Otto Braendli; Alexander Moeller; Ulrich Mansmann; Erika von Mutius; Johannes Wildhaber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Respiratory infections and lung function in an Australian Aboriginal community.

Authors:  A W Bill Musk; Alan L James; Lyle J Palmer; Gerard F Ryan; Fiona Lake; Clayton L Golledge; Nicholas H De Klerk
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.424

5.  Implications of using the GLI-2012, GOLD and Australian COPD-X recommendations in assessing the severity of airflow limitation on spirometry among an Indigenous population with COPD: an Indigenous Australians perspective study.

Authors:  Subash Heraganahally; Timothy P Howarth; Elisha White; Helmi Ben Saad
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2021-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.