Literature DB >> 1565039

Standardized (simulated) patients' accuracy in recording clinical performance check-list items.

N V Vu1, M M Marcy, J A Colliver, S J Verhulst, T A Travis, H S Barrows.   

Abstract

In large-scale performance-based assessment of medical professionals' clinical competence, simulated patients (standardized patients-SPs) are used not only to simulate case problems but also to record on check-list the examinees' clinical performance during their encounter with the SPs. The purposes of this study were to determine the SPs' overall accuracy in recording check-list items, and whether their accuracy was affected by the various characteristics of the check-list, and by the different times during a day and the different days within the examination when the recordings were obtained. Results showed that the SPs' accuracy in recording check-list items was good to very good and was affected by the length of the check-list, as well as by the type and the clarity of the check-list item. It was further found that the SPs' accuracy was consistent and did not vary over the course of a one-day or a 15-day examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1565039     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1992.tb00133.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  14 in total

1.  Simulated surgery in the summative assessment of general practice training: results of a trial in the Trent and Yorkshire regions.

Authors:  J Allen; A Evans; J Foulkes; A French
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Use of videotaped consultations in summative assessment of trainees in general practice.

Authors:  L M Campbell; J G Howie; T S Murray
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  An instrument for assessment of videotapes of general practitioners' performance.

Authors:  J Cox; H Mulholland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-17

4.  How do physicians respond to patient's requests for costly, unindicated services?

Authors:  T H Gallagher; B Lo; M Chesney; K Christensen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Measuring compliance with preventive care guidelines: standardized patients, clinical vignettes, and the medical record.

Authors:  T R Dresselhaus; J W Peabody; M Lee; M M Wang; J Luck
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  An evaluation of vignettes for predicting variation in the quality of preventive care.

Authors:  Timothy R Dresselhaus; John W Peabody; Jeff Luck; Dan Bertenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Standardized patient outcomes trial (SPOT) in neurology.

Authors:  Joseph E Safdieh; Andrew L Lin; Juliet Aizer; Peter M Marzuk; Bernice Grafstein; Carol Storey-Johnson; Yoon Kang
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2011-01-14

8.  Does Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Score Reflect the Clinical Reasoning Ability of Medical Students?

Authors:  Wan Beom Park; Seok Hoon Kang; Yoon-Seong Lee; Sun Jung Myung
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.378

9.  Probing the effect of OSCE checklist length on inter-observer reliability and observer accuracy.

Authors:  Katrina F Hurley; Nick A Giffin; Samuel A Stewart; Graham B Bullock
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2015-10-20

10.  A pilot study of marking accuracy and mental workload as measures of OSCE examiner performance.

Authors:  Aidan Byrne; Tereza Soskova; Jayne Dawkins; Lee Coombes
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.