STUDY OBJECTIVE: Previous studies into the effect of area of residence on individuals' health have not accounted for changing residency over time, although few people remain resident in the same area throughout their life. Furthermore, few studies of area effects on health have accounted for the clustering of health at the household level. These methodological problems may have led previous studies to under estimate or over estimate the size of area level effects. This study uses multiple membership multilevel models to investigate whether longitudinal analyses of area effects on health need to take account of clustering at the household level. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A longitudinal survey (1991-1999) of a nationally representative sample of British households (5511 households with 10 264 adult members). DESIGN: Two level (individuals within households or areas) and three level (individuals within households within areas) multiple membership models of SF-36 physical and mental health functioning scores at wave nine were analysed adjusting for age, gender, education, marital, employment, and smoking status from previous waves. RESULTS: Physical and mental health functioning seem to cluster within households. Accounting for changes in household membership over time increases estimates of the clustering in functioning at the household level. The clustering of functioning within area wards is reduced when the clustering within households and risk factors for functioning are taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: Clustered sampling units within study designs should be taken account of in individual level analyses. Changes in these units over time should be accounted for in longitudinal analysis.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Previous studies into the effect of area of residence on individuals' health have not accounted for changing residency over time, although few people remain resident in the same area throughout their life. Furthermore, few studies of area effects on health have accounted for the clustering of health at the household level. These methodological problems may have led previous studies to under estimate or over estimate the size of area level effects. This study uses multiple membership multilevel models to investigate whether longitudinal analyses of area effects on health need to take account of clustering at the household level. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A longitudinal survey (1991-1999) of a nationally representative sample of British households (5511 households with 10 264 adult members). DESIGN: Two level (individuals within households or areas) and three level (individuals within households within areas) multiple membership models of SF-36 physical and mental health functioning scores at wave nine were analysed adjusting for age, gender, education, marital, employment, and smoking status from previous waves. RESULTS: Physical and mental health functioning seem to cluster within households. Accounting for changes in household membership over time increases estimates of the clustering in functioning at the household level. The clustering of functioning within area wards is reduced when the clustering within households and risk factors for functioning are taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: Clustered sampling units within study designs should be taken account of in individual level analyses. Changes in these units over time should be accounted for in longitudinal analysis.
Authors: Frances B Saadeh; Melissa A Clark; Michelle L Rogers; Crystal D Linkletter; Maureen G Phipps; James F Padbury; Patrick M Vivier Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2013-02
Authors: Marcelo L Urquia; John W Frank; Richard H Glazier; Rahim Moineddin; Flora I Matheson; Anita J Gagnon Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-12-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sara Marie Nilsen; Johan Håkon Bjørngaard; Linda Ernstsen; Steinar Krokstad; Steinar Westin Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Patrick Bodenmann; Bernard Favrat; Hans Wolff; Idris Guessous; Francesco Panese; Lilli Herzig; Thomas Bischoff; Alejandra Casillas; Thomas Golano; Paul Vaucher Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 3.240