Literature DB >> 15650131

Sleeve sensor versus high-resolution manometry for the detection of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations.

A J Bredenoord1, B L A M Weusten, R Timmer, A J P M Smout.   

Abstract

Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are the most important mechanism by which gastroesophageal reflux occurs, and sleeve sensor manometry is the gold standard for detection of TLESRs. The aim of this study was to evaluate manometry with closely spaced sideholes (high-resolution manometry) for the detection of TLESRs as an alternative. In 12 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, a 90-min postprandial manometry was performed by using a catheter incorporating both a sleeve sensor and closely spaced sideholes in the esophagogastric junction. TLESRs recorded with both techniques were scored. Reflux during TLESRs was detected by using manometry (common cavity), intraluminal impedance, and pH monitoring. A total of 145 TLESRs were detected by using both techniques, 117 with high-resolution manometry and 108 with sleeve sensor manometry [not significant (NS)]. Manometric signs of reflux during TLESRs detected with high-resolution and sleeve sensor manometry were found in 62.4 and 56.5%, NS, respectively, versus 38.5 and 35.2%, NS on pH-metry and 70.1 and 60.2%, NS on impedance monitoring. TLESRs recognized only with high-resolution manometry were more often accompanied by reflux, as detected with manometry (59.5%) and impedance monitoring (67.6%), than TLESRs recognized only with sleeve sensor manometry (32.1 and 28.6%). High-resolution manometry is at least as accurate as sleeve sensor manometry for the detection of TLESRs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15650131     DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00478.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol        ISSN: 0193-1857            Impact factor:   4.052


  6 in total

1.  The effect of an effortful swallow on the normal adult esophagus.

Authors:  Teresa E Lever; Kathleen T Cox; Donald Holbert; Mamun Shahrier; Monica Hough; Kristine Kelley-Salamon
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 2.  Esophageal motility abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Irene Martinucci; Nicola de Bortoli; Maria Giacchino; Giorgia Bodini; Elisa Marabotto; Santino Marchi; Vincenzo Savarino; Edoardo Savarino
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-05-06

Review 3.  High resolution manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance oesophageal manometry in clinical practice.

Authors:  Inder Mainie
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-31

4.  High-resolution esophageal manometry: a time motion study.

Authors:  Daniel C Sadowski; Linda Broenink
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Effect of transoral incisionless fundoplication on reflux mechanisms.

Authors:  Nicolaas F Rinsma; Fabiënne G Smeets; Daisy W Bruls; Boudewijn F Kessing; Nicole D Bouvy; Ad A M Masclee; José M Conchillo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of High-resolution Anorectal Manometry With Water-perfused Anorectal Manometry.

Authors:  Hye Ran Kang; Ji-Eun Lee; Joon Seong Lee; Tae Hee Lee; Su Jin Hong; Jin Oh Kim; Seong Ran Jeon; Hyun Gun Kim
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.924

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.