R Skov1, R Smyth, A R Larsen, N Frimodt-Møller, G Kahlmeter. 1. National Center for Antimicrobials and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark. rsk@ssi.dk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cefoxitin 5 and 10 microg discs for detection of methicillin resistance in staphylococci. METHODS: Six hundred and forty-one Staphylococcus aureus (261 mecA-negative and 380 mecA-positive) and 344 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (132 mecA-negative and 212 mecA-positive) were investigated. The CoNS represented nine species, Staphylococcus epidermidis being the most frequent (n = 231). All isolates were tested using semi-confluent growth on Iso-Sensitest agar (ISA), and Mueller-Hinton agar (MH) using a 5 and a 10 microg cefoxitin disc and overnight incubation in ambient air at 35-37 degrees C. RESULTS: For S. aureus, both cefoxitin discs performed with high accuracy on both media. The sensitivity and specificity for the following proposed interpretive zone diameters were: ISA 5 microg, R < 14 mm (99.5% and 98.1%); ISA 10 microg, R < 22 mm (99.5% and 98.1%); MH 5 microg, R < 12 mm (99.7% and 98.1%); and MH 10 microg, R < 18 mm (99.5% and 98.9%), respectively. All four variants were superior to oxacillin using the former SRGA methodology. In CoNS, a substantial overlap was seen for all variants. However, by avoiding primary interpretation in the overlapping interval, highly accurate results could be obtained for 81%, 80%, 91% and 97% of the isolates, respectively. CONCLUSION: For S. aureus, cefoxitin 5 and 10 microg discs performed with high accuracy on both ISA and MH using semi-confluent growth and standard incubation conditions. With the introduction of a defined interval in which primary interpretation should be avoided, the method could also be used for CoNS.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cefoxitin 5 and 10 microg discs for detection of methicillin resistance in staphylococci. METHODS: Six hundred and forty-one Staphylococcus aureus (261 mecA-negative and 380 mecA-positive) and 344 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (132 mecA-negative and 212 mecA-positive) were investigated. The CoNS represented nine species, Staphylococcus epidermidis being the most frequent (n = 231). All isolates were tested using semi-confluent growth on Iso-Sensitest agar (ISA), and Mueller-Hinton agar (MH) using a 5 and a 10 microg cefoxitin disc and overnight incubation in ambient air at 35-37 degrees C. RESULTS: For S. aureus, both cefoxitin discs performed with high accuracy on both media. The sensitivity and specificity for the following proposed interpretive zone diameters were: ISA 5 microg, R < 14 mm (99.5% and 98.1%); ISA 10 microg, R < 22 mm (99.5% and 98.1%); MH 5 microg, R < 12 mm (99.7% and 98.1%); and MH 10 microg, R < 18 mm (99.5% and 98.9%), respectively. All four variants were superior to oxacillin using the former SRGA methodology. In CoNS, a substantial overlap was seen for all variants. However, by avoiding primary interpretation in the overlapping interval, highly accurate results could be obtained for 81%, 80%, 91% and 97% of the isolates, respectively. CONCLUSION: For S. aureus, cefoxitin 5 and 10 microg discs performed with high accuracy on both ISA and MH using semi-confluent growth and standard incubation conditions. With the introduction of a defined interval in which primary interpretation should be avoided, the method could also be used for CoNS.
Authors: Kristine Gjødsbøl; Mette E Skindersoe; Jens Jørgen Christensen; Tonny Karlsmark; Bo Jørgensen; Anders Mørup Jensen; Bjarke M Klein; Michael K Sonnested; Karen A Krogfelt Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: B Perazzi; M Rodríguez Fermepin; A Malimovka; S D García; M Orgambide; C A Vay; R de Torres; A M R Famiglietti Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: R Skov; R Smyth; A R Larsen; A Bolmstrôm; A Karlsson; K Mills; N Frimodt-Moller; G Kahlmeter Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2006-10-18 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Valéria Cataneli Pereira; André Martins; Lígia Maria Suppo de Souza Rugolo; Maria de Lourdes Ribeiro de Souza da Cunha Journal: Clin Med Pediatr Date: 2009-03-18