Literature DB >> 15649835

Quality and safety issues of web-based information about herbal medicines in the treatment of cancer.

Alexander Molassiotis1, Min Xu.   

Abstract

A number of studies have been carried out to assess health information on the internet and they all have demonstrated that, whereas the internet can be the third opinion for many patients, often contains inaccurate and misleading information. Furthermore, as herbal medicines are increasingly used by patients, it is imperative to assess the quality of information presented on the internet. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the quality and safety of the information presented on the internet about medicinal herbs specifically in the field of cancer. Two hundred relevant websites were initially selected from a process using 10 search engines and the keywords 'herbs' and 'cancer', and 43 sites actually met all inclusion criteria. Assessment of both quality and safety indicators was carried out using the DISCERN instrument, which has been developed to enable consumers and information providers to judge the quality of health information. Readability scores of the sites were also obtained (Flesch formula). It was shown that most sites had low quality in a number of indicators, including accuracy of information, revealing sources of information, biased presentation of information or regularity of updates. The mean score for quality was 22.12 (S.D.=4.18) out of a maximum score of 50. The mean safety score was 13.26 (S.D.=2.14) out of a maximum score of 30. Commercial sites had the most inaccurate or misleading information, emphasizing only the positive aspects of the use of herbs, with little or no evidence. The only biomedical sites assessed achieved the highest score in both quality and safety. Readability of the information was equal to the school level of college (mean=44.63). Seven percent of the sites discouraged the use of conventional medicine. Results suggest that health professionals should talk about use of alternative therapies with their patients and help them find the best available information when using the internet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15649835     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2004.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Complement Ther Med        ISSN: 0965-2299            Impact factor:   2.446


  18 in total

1.  [An evaluation of the quality of health web pages using a validated questionnaire].

Authors:  Maria del Carmen Conesa Fuentes; Enrique Aguinaga Ontoso; Juan José Hernández Morante
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  A Template for Authoring and Adapting Genomic Medicine Content in the eMERGE Infobutton Project.

Authors:  Casey L Overby; Luke V Rasmussen; Andrea Hartzler; John J Connolly; Josh F Peterson; RoseMary E Hedberg; Robert R Freimuth; Brian H Shirts; Joshua C Denny; Eric B Larson; Christopher G Chute; Gail P Jarvik; James D Ralston; Alan R Shuldiner; Justin Starren; Iftikhar J Kullo; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; Marc S Williams
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

Review 3.  Identifying Complementary and Alternative Medicine Usage Information from Internet Resources. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vivekanand Sharma; John H Holmes; Indra N Sarkar
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Prevention, complementary therapies, and new scientific developments in the field of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Philip Kantoff
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

Review 5.  Beyond reading level: a systematic review of the suitability of cancer education print and Web-based materials.

Authors:  Ramona K C Finnie; Tisha M Felder; Suzanne Kneuper Linder; Patricia Dolan Mullen
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Readability of patient and health care professional targeted dietary supplement leaflets used for diabetes and chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  Kevin A Clauson; Qing Zeng-Treitler; Sasikiran Kandula
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.579

7.  Use of chinese herb medicine in cancer patients: a survey in southwestern china.

Authors:  Tai-Guo Liu; Shao-Quan Xiong; Yan Yan; Hong Zhu; Cheng Yi
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 8.  A Review of Black Salve: Cancer Specificity, Cure, and Cosmesis.

Authors:  Andrew Croaker; Graham J King; John H Pyne; Shailendra Anoopkumar-Dukie; Lei Liu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Prevalence and Predictors for Nonuse of Complementary Medicine among Breast and Gynecological Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Daniela Paepke; Clea Wiedeck; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Kristina Karmazin; Marion Kiechle; Christine Brambs
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Developing a web-based information resource for palliative care: an action-research inspired approach.

Authors:  Annette F Street; Kathleen Swift; Merilyn Annells; Roger Woodruff; Terry Gliddon; Anne Oakley; Goetz Ottman
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.