Literature DB >> 15649677

A Medicare database review found that physician preferences increasingly outweighed patient characteristics as determinants of first-time prescriptions for COX-2 inhibitors.

Sebastian Schneeweiss1, Robert J Glynn, Jerry Avorn, Daniel H Solomon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although innovative drugs may be underprescribed by some physicians, it is possible that rapid adoption after market introduction may lead to prescribing such drugs to patients without a clear indication. We sought to quantify the relative contributions of patient vs. physician factors to the decision to prescribe selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors during the first 2 years of their availability.
METHODS: A cohort of 37,957 Medicare beneficiaries who were enrolled in the Pharmaceutical Assistance Contract for the Elderly in Pennsylvania was identified. All patients had started using nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or selective COX-2 inhibitors between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2000, and had no prior NSAID use. All had full prescription drug coverage, including NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors. Subsequent prescriptions were not considered. We quantified the amount of variation in first-time COX-2 prescribing that could be explained by predictors of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, other patient characteristics, or physician preferences. Explained variation was calculated as the R(2) (standardized to range from 0 to 1) from unconditional logistic regression and random intercept mixed effects logistic regression, fitted separately in each of eight consecutive 3-month periods.
RESULTS: COX-2 inhibitors were adopted as the preferred NSAID by 55% of physicians within 180 days after they were marketed. In new NSAID users, COX-2 prescribing was twice as dependent on physician prescribing preferences (R(2)=60%) as on the combined predictors of GI toxicity (R(2)=3%) and other patient factors (R(2)=30%). The ratio of COX-2 prescribing explained by physician preferences over the contribution of patient factors increased from 2 to more than 10 over a 24-month period.
CONCLUSIONS: First-time COX-2 inhibitor prescribing was somewhat dependent on patient factors in the first quarter of marketing, but the proportional influence of physician preferences increased substantially over the following 2 years, raising the question of why physician factors and not patient risk factors influence COX-2 inhibitor prescribing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15649677     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  33 in total

1.  High-dimensional versus conventional propensity scores in a comparative effectiveness study of coxibs and reduced upper gastrointestinal complications.

Authors:  E Garbe; S Kloss; M Suling; I Pigeot; S Schneeweiss
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  A technical infrastructure to conduct randomized database studies facilitated by a general practice research database.

Authors:  Georgio Mosis; Albert E Vlug; Mees Mosseveld; Jeanne P Dieleman; Bruno C Stricker; Johan van der Lei; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Evaluating short-term drug effects using a physician-specific prescribing preference as an instrumental variable.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Philip S Wang; Daniel H Solomon; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Channeling and adherence with alendronate and risedronate among chronic glucocorticoid users.

Authors:  J R Curtis; A O Westfall; J J Allison; A Freeman; K G Saag
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Understanding secondary databases: a commentary on "Sources of bias for health state characteristics in secondary databases".

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 6.  Developments in post-marketing comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  S Schneeweiss
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Increasing levels of restriction in pharmacoepidemiologic database studies of elderly and comparison with randomized trial results.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss; Amanda R Patrick; Til Stürmer; M Alan Brookhart; Jerry Avorn; Malcolm Maclure; Kenneth J Rothman; Robert J Glynn
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Preference-based instrumental variable methods for the estimation of treatment effects: assessing validity and interpreting results.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.968

9.  Safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin in routine care of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jeremy A Rassen; Murray A Mittleman; Robert J Glynn; M Alan Brookhart; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Antipsychotic prescribing: do conflict of interest policies make a difference?

Authors:  Timothy S Anderson; Haiden A Huskamp; Andrew J Epstein; Colleen L Barry; Aiju Men; Ernst R Berndt; Marcela Horvitz-Lennon; Sharon-Lise Normand; Julie M Donohue
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.