Literature DB >> 15649524

Persistence, spread and the drift paradox.

E Pachepsky1, F Lutscher, R M Nisbet, M A Lewis.   

Abstract

We derive conditions for persistence and spread of a population where individuals are either immobile or dispersing by advection and diffusion through a one-dimensional medium with a unidirectional flow. Reproduction occurs only in the stationary phase. Examples of such systems are found in rivers and streams, marine currents, and areas with prevalent wind direction. In streams, a long-standing question, dubbed 'the drift paradox', asks why aquatic insects faced with downstream drift are able to persist in upper stream reaches. For our two-phase model, persistence of the population is guaranteed if, at low population densities, the local growth rate of the stationary component of the population exceeds the rate of entry of individuals into the drift. Otherwise the persistence condition involves all the model parameters, and persistence requires a critical (minimum) domain size. We calculate the rate at which invasion fronts propagate up- and downstream, and show that persistence and ability to spread are closely connected: if the population cannot advance upstream against the flow, it also cannot persist on any finite spatial domain. By studying two limiting cases of our model, we show that residence in the immobile state always enhances population persistence. We use our findings to evaluate a number of mechanisms previously proposed in the ecological literature as resolutions of the drift paradox.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15649524     DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2004.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  18 in total

1.  Analysis of spread and persistence for stream insects with winged adult stages.

Authors:  Olga Vasilyeva; Frithjof Lutscher; Mark Lewis
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Navigating the flow: individual and continuum models for homing in flowing environments.

Authors:  Kevin J Painter; Thomas Hillen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Concordant genetic estimators of migration reveal anthropogenically enhanced source-sink population structure in the river sculpin, Cottus gobio.

Authors:  B Hänfling; D Weetman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Density-dependent dispersal in integrodifference equations.

Authors:  Frithjof Lutscher
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Can a species keep pace with a shifting climate?

Authors:  H Berestycki; O Diekmann; C J Nagelkerke; P A Zegeling
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Population persistence in river networks.

Authors:  Jonathan Sarhad; Robert Carlson; Kurt E Anderson
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Seasonal influences on population spread and persistence in streams: spreading speeds.

Authors:  Yu Jin; Mark A Lewis
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  A nonlocal and periodic reaction-diffusion-advection model of a single phytoplankton species.

Authors:  Rui Peng; Xiao-Qiang Zhao
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Persistence and extinction of population in reaction-diffusion-advection model with strong Allee effect growth.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Junping Shi; Jinfeng Wang
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.259

10.  Individual behavior at habitat edges may help populations persist in moving habitats.

Authors:  Jane S MacDonald; Frithjof Lutscher
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.259

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.