Literature DB >> 15649094

Review of monoisocentric split-field technique for conventional and IMRT treatment in head and neck cancers: technical limitations and approaches for optimization.

Khaled Abdel-Hakim1, Tetsuo Nishimura, Michikatsu Takai, Harumi Sakahara.   

Abstract

The importance of treatment planning of head and neck malignancies arises from the necessity to achieve homogenous doses to localized target volume surrounded by normal structures, which can produce acute and long-term morbidity. In many radiotherapy departments, a commonly employed strategy is a 3-field technique. Bilateral parallel-opposed fields are matched to anterior lower neck field. In recent years, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) is used to radiate head and neck tumors. When the target extends to the lower neck regions, abutment of upper IMRT and lower neck fields is required. Field matching represents a technical challenge for the medical physicist, medical engineer, and radiation oncologist to treat multiple fields while avoiding their overlap on the spinal cord. The monoisocentric split field technique has recently become a common technique to achieve matchline homogenous dose while respecting normal tissue tolerance. The aim of this work is to review merits, limitations, and recent approaches to optimize matchline dose in monoisocentric technique in conventional and intensity modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. Although the technique has many advantages, it is subjected to some systematic and random errors due to equipment and patient setup inaccuracies. To decrease the magnitude of matchline inhomogeneities, customized penumbra generator or multileaf collimator have been used. Both methods are viable and represent alternative approaches to the problem of field matching using the asymmetric jaws.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15649094     DOI: 10.1177/153303460500400114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  4 in total

1.  Optimizing laryngeal sparing with intensity modulated radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy for unilateral tonsil cancer.

Authors:  Amy C Moreno; Christopher Wilke; He Wang; Shi-Ming Samuel Tung; Courtney Pollard; Adam S Garden; William H Morrison; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller; Gary B Gunn; Jay P Reddy; Shalin J Shah; Steven J Frank; Vinita Takiar; Jack Phan
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-05-01

2.  Defining the dose-volume criteria for laryngeal sparing in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer utilizing split-field IMRT, whole-field IMRT and VMAT.

Authors:  Christopher Wilke; Vinita Takiar; He Wang; Amy C Moreno; Shih-Ming Samuel Tung; Sean R Quinlan-Davidson; Adam S Garden; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller; Gary B Gunn; Jay P Reddy; William H Morrison; Congjun Wang; George Zhao; Katherine A Hutcheson; Jack Phan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  In vitro quality assurance of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy mono-isocentric plan for simultaneous treatment of two targets.

Authors:  Misba Hamid Baba; Benoy Kumar Singh
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb

4.  Effective Organs-at-Risk Dose Sparing in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Using a Half-Beam Technique in Whole Pelvic Irradiation.

Authors:  Hyunsoo Jang; Jiyeon Park; Mark Artz; Yawei Zhang; Jacob C Ricci; Soon Huh; Perry B Johnson; Mi-Hwa Kim; Mison Chun; Young-Taek Oh; O Kyu Noh; Hae-Jin Park
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.