Literature DB >> 15648802

Evaluation of selected sidewalk pavement surfaces for vibration experienced by users of manual and powered wheelchairs.

Rory A Cooper1, Erik Wolf, Shirley G Fitzgerald, Annmarie Kellerher, William Ammer, Michael L Boninger, Rosemarie Cooper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obstacles such as bumps, curb descents, and uneven driving surfaces cause vibrations that affect the wheelchair, and in turn, the wheelchair user. Chronic exposure can cause low-back pain, disk degeneration, and other harmful effects. Little research has been conducted to assess the vibrations experienced by wheelchair users.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to conduct an evaluation of the vibration exposure during electric-powered wheelchair driving and mechanical energy requirements for manual wheelchair propulsion over selected sidewalk surfaces. The goal was to determine the criteria for a wheelchair-pedestrian access route that does not require excessive propulsive work or expose wheelchair users to potentially harmful vibrations.
METHODS: Ten unimpaired individuals participated in this study. Six sidewalk surfaces were tested. Measured variables included power of the acceleration per octave, mechanical work to propel over surfaces, peak acceleration, and frequency at which peak acceleration occurs.
RESULTS: For both the manual and electric-powered wheelchair, at 1 m/s, significant differences were found in peak accelerations between the seat and footrest (P < 0.0001) and between the sidewalk surfaces (P = 0.004). The greatest risk for injury caused by shock and vibration exposure occurs at frequencies near the natural frequency of seated humans (4-15 Hz). The values for work required to propel over the surfaces tested were not statistically significantly different. Besides appearance and construction, the only distinguishing characteristic was surface roughness caused by the joints.
CONCLUSION: When treating the poured concrete sidewalk as the standard, surfaces 2, 3, 5, and 6 compared most favorably in terms of vibration exposure, whereas surface 4 produced mixed results. Surfaces 2, 3, 5, and 6 yielded results that were similar to the poured concrete sidewalk and could be considered acceptable for wheelchair users. In conclusion, surfaces other than the traditional poured concrete can be used for pedestrian access routes without adding vibration exposure or reducing propulsion efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15648802     DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2004.11752239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med        ISSN: 1079-0268            Impact factor:   1.985


  5 in total

1.  Prevalence and factors associated with a higher risk of neck and back pain among permanent wheelchair users: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Francisco M Kovacs; Jesús Seco; Ana Royuela; Andrés Barriga; Javier Zamora
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  SMARTWheel: From concept to clinical practice.

Authors:  Rory A Cooper
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Effect of wheelchair frame material on users' mechanical work and transmitted vibration.

Authors:  Félix Chénier; Rachid Aissaoui
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Developing product quality standards for wheelchairs used in less-resourced environments.

Authors:  Anand Mhatre; Daniel Martin; Matt McCambridge; Norman Reese; Mark Sullivan; Don Schoendorfer; Eric Wunderlich; Chris Rushman; Dave Mahilo; Jon Pearlman
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2017-09-08

5.  Concrete Paving Slabs for Comfort of Movement of Mobility-Impaired Pedestrians-A Survey.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojnowska-Heciak; Jakub Heciak; Adam Kłak
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.