Literature DB >> 15648750

Intra- and interlaboratory calibration of the DR CALUX bioassay for the analysis of dioxins and dioxin-like chemicals in sediments.

Harrie T Besselink1, Cor Schipper, Hans Klamer, Pim Leonards, Henk Verhaar, Emiel Felzel, Albertinka J Murk, John Thain, Kazunori Hosoe, Greet Schoeters, Juliette Legler, Bram Brouwer.   

Abstract

In the Fourth National Policy Document on Water Management in The Netherlands, it is defined that in 2003, in addition to the assessment of chemical substances, special guidelines for the assessment of dredged material should be recorded. The assessment of dredged material is based on integrated chemical and biological effect measurements. Among others, the DR CALUX (dioxin responsive-chemically activated luciferase expression) bioassay has tentatively been recommended for inclusion in the dredged material assessment. To ensure the reliability of this bioassay, an intra- and interlaboratory validation study, or ring test, was performed, organized by the Dutch National Institute for Coastal and Marine Management (RIKZ) in cooperation with BioDetection Systems BV (BDS). The intralaboratory repeatability and reproducibility and the limit of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) of the DR CALUX bioassay were determined by analyzing sediment extracts and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) blanks. The highest observed repeatability was found to be 24.1%, whereas the highest observed reproducibility was calculated to be 19.9%. Based on the obtained results, the LOD and LOQ to be applied for the bioassay are 0.3 and 1.0 pM, respectively. The interlaboratory calibration study was divided into three phases, starting with analyzing pure chemicals. During the second phase, sediment extracts were analyzed, whereas in the third phase, whole sediments had to be extracted, cleaned, and analyzed. The average interlaboratory repeatability increased from 14.6% for the analysis of pure compound to 26.1% for the analysis of whole matrix. A similar increase in reproducibility with increasing complexity of handlings was observed with the interlaboratory reproducibility of 6.5% for pure compound and 27.9% for whole matrix. The results of this study are intended as a starting point for implementing the integrated chemical-biological assessment strategy and for systematic monitoring of dredged materials and related materials in the coming years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15648750     DOI: 10.1897/03-542.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  10 in total

Review 1.  Advances in analytical techniques for polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans and dioxin-like PCBs.

Authors:  Eric J Reiner; Ray E Clement; Allan B Okey; Chris H Marvin
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Effect-based assessment of persistent organic pollutant and pesticide dumpsite using mammalian CALUX reporter cell lines.

Authors:  B Pieterse; I J C Rijk; E Simon; B M A van Vugt-Lussenburg; B F H Fokke; M van der Wijk; H Besselink; R Weber; B van der Burg
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  In vitro tools for the toxicological evaluation of sediments and dredged materials: intra- and inter-laboratory comparisons of chemical and bioanalytical methods.

Authors:  Kathrin Eichbaum; Markus Brinkmann; Leonie Nuesser; Carolin Gembé; Marina Ohlig; Sebastian Buchinger; Georg Reifferscheid; Markus Hecker; John P Giesy; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Bioanalytical and instrumental screening of the uptake of sediment-borne, dioxin-like compounds in roach (Rutilus rutilus).

Authors:  Kathrin Eichbaum; Markus Brinkmann; Leonie Nuesser; Sebastian Buchinger; Georg Reifferscheid; Garry Codling; Paul Jones; John P Giesy; Markus Hecker; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Analysis of dioxins in contaminated soils with the calux and caflux bioassays, an immunoassay, and gas chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Malin Nording; Michael S Denison; David Baston; Ylva Persson; Erik Spinnel; Peter Haglund
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 6.  Detection of organic compounds with whole-cell bioluminescent bioassays.

Authors:  Tingting Xu; Dan Close; Abby Smartt; Steven Ripp; Gary Sayler
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.635

7.  Correlating biodegradation kinetics of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin to the dynamics of microbial communities originating from soil in Vietnam contaminated with herbicides and dioxins.

Authors:  Thi Lan Anh Nguyen; Ha Thi Cam Dang; Ton That Huu Dat; Bernd W Brandt; Wilfred F M Röling; Abraham Brouwer; Rob J M van Spanning
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 8.  Immunoanalysis methods for the detection of dioxins and related chemicals.

Authors:  Wenjing Tian; Heidi Qunhui Xie; Hualing Fu; Xinhui Pei; Bin Zhao
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Dioxin in the Elbe river basin: policy and science under the water framework directive 2000-2015 and toward 2021.

Authors:  Ulrich Förstner; Henner Hollert; Markus Brinkmann; Kathrin Eichbaum; Roland Weber; Wim Salomons
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 5.893

10.  First Attempt to Couple Proteomics with the AhR Reporter Gene Bioassay in Soil Pollution Monitoring and Assessment.

Authors:  Claudia Landi; Giulia Liberatori; Pietro Cotugno; Lucrezia Sturba; Maria Luisa Vannuccini; Federica Massari; Daniela Valeria Miniero; Angelo Tursi; Enxhi Shaba; Peter A Behnisch; Alfonso Carleo; Fabrizio Di Giuseppe; Stefania Angelucci; Luca Bini; Ilaria Corsi
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-12-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.