PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The clinical use of double-boosted protease inhibitor regimens has evolved recently. This strategy offers a number of unique benefits, including pharmacokinetic enhancement of two different protease inhibitors with low dose ritonavir. We review the pharmacologic rationale for the double-boosted protease inhibitor combinations and the complex drug-drug interactions that occur among different protease inhibitors when co-administered. RECENT FINDINGS: The discovery and widespread clinical use of low dose ritonavir as a pharmacoenhancer of other protease inhibitors has significantly improved the management of HIV infection treatment. This has subsequently led to the development of double-boosted protease inhibitor regimens which have been shown to be effective in heavily pre-treated patients, in whom it is crucial to maintain drug concentrations sufficient to suppress viruses with multiple resistance mutations. Interesting pharmacokinetic data have been recently produced showing the complexity of the interactions among three protease inhibitors. As the outcome of these multidrug interactions may be difficult to predict, formal pharmacokinetic studies have been fundamental to determine which protease inhibitors are best to administer in combination. SUMMARY: This review summarizes the current literature regarding the pharmacokinetics of double-boosted protease inhibitor regimens and general considerations regarding their usage in the treatment of HIV-infected patients.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The clinical use of double-boosted protease inhibitor regimens has evolved recently. This strategy offers a number of unique benefits, including pharmacokinetic enhancement of two different protease inhibitors with low dose ritonavir. We review the pharmacologic rationale for the double-boosted protease inhibitor combinations and the complex drug-drug interactions that occur among different protease inhibitors when co-administered. RECENT FINDINGS: The discovery and widespread clinical use of low dose ritonavir as a pharmacoenhancer of other protease inhibitors has significantly improved the management of HIV infection treatment. This has subsequently led to the development of double-boosted protease inhibitor regimens which have been shown to be effective in heavily pre-treated patients, in whom it is crucial to maintain drug concentrations sufficient to suppress viruses with multiple resistance mutations. Interesting pharmacokinetic data have been recently produced showing the complexity of the interactions among three protease inhibitors. As the outcome of these multidrug interactions may be difficult to predict, formal pharmacokinetic studies have been fundamental to determine which protease inhibitors are best to administer in combination. SUMMARY: This review summarizes the current literature regarding the pharmacokinetics of double-boosted protease inhibitor regimens and general considerations regarding their usage in the treatment of HIV-infectedpatients.
Authors: Regina B Osih; Patrick Taffé; Martin Rickenbach; Angèle Gayet-Ageron; Luigia Elzi; Christoph Fux; Milos Opravil; Enos Bernasconi; Patrick Schmid; Huldrych F Günthard; Matthias Cavassini Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2010-10-07 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Christopher J Bungard; Peter D Williams; Jeanine E Ballard; David J Bennett; Christian Beaulieu; Carolyn Bahnck-Teets; Steve S Carroll; Ronald K Chang; David C Dubost; John F Fay; Tracy L Diamond; Thomas J Greshock; Li Hao; M Katharine Holloway; Peter J Felock; Jennifer J Gesell; Hua-Poo Su; Jesse J Manikowski; Daniel J McKay; Mike Miller; Xu Min; Carmela Molinaro; Oscar M Moradei; Philippe G Nantermet; Christian Nadeau; Rosa I Sanchez; Tummanapalli Satyanarayana; William D Shipe; Sanjay K Singh; Vouy Linh Truong; Sivalenka Vijayasaradhi; Catherine M Wiscount; Joseph P Vacca; Sheldon N Crane; John A McCauley Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Marc A Kowalkowski; Jennifer R Kramer; Peter R Richardson; Insia Suteria; Elizabeth Y Chiao Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Tanuja N Gengiah; Andrew L Gray; Kogieleum Naidoo; Quarraisha Abdool Karim Journal: Expert Opin Drug Saf Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 4.250
Authors: Qing Ma; Barry S Zingman; Amneris E Luque; Margaret A Fischl; Barbara M Gripshover; Charles S Venuto; Robin DiFrancesco; Alan Forrest; Gene D Morse Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Nils von Hentig; Axel Müller; Carsten Rottmann; Timo Wolf; Thomas Lutz; Stephan Klauke; Michael Kurowski; Bruno Oertel; Brenda Dauer; Sebastian Harder; Schlomo Staszewski Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2007-02-12 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Heekyoung Choi; Su Jin Jeong; Han Sung Lee; Bum Sik Chin; Suk Hoon Choi; Sang Hoon Han; Myung Soo Kim; Chang Oh Kim; Jun Yong Choi; Young Goo Song; June Myung Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 2.153