Literature DB >> 15647497

Distinct properties of stimulus-evoked bursts in the lateral geniculate nucleus.

Henry J Alitto1, Theodore G Weyand, W Martin Usrey.   

Abstract

Neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of the thalamus produce spikes that can be classified as burst spikes and tonic spikes. Although burst spikes are generally associated with states of sleep and drowsiness, bursts may also play an important role in sensory processing. This study explores the stimulus properties that evoke burst and tonic spikes and examines the reliability of LGN neurons to produce visually driven bursts. Using reverse-correlation techniques, we show that the receptive fields of burst spikes are similar to, but significantly different from, the receptive fields of tonic spikes. Compared with tonic spikes, burst spikes (1) occur with a shorter latency between stimulus and response, (2) have a greater dependence on stimuli with transitions from suppressive to preferred states, and (3) prefer stimuli that provide increased drive to the receptive field center and even greater increased drive to the receptive field surround. These differences are not attributable to the long interspike interval that precedes burst spikes, because tonic spikes with similar preceding interspike intervals also differ from burst spikes in both the spatial and temporal domains. Finally, measures of reliability are significantly greater for burst spikes than for tonic spikes with similar preceding interspike intervals. These results demonstrate that thalamic bursts contribute to sensory processing and can reliably provide the cortex with information that is similar to, but distinct from, that of tonic spikes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15647497      PMCID: PMC6725468          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3369-04.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  50 in total

1.  A wake-up call from the thalamus.

Authors:  S M Sherman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The impact of 'bursting' thalamic impulses at a neocortical synapse.

Authors:  H A Swadlow; A G Gusev
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Efficacy of thalamocortical and intracortical synaptic connections: quanta, innervation, and reliability.

Authors:  Z Gil; B W Connors; Y Amitai
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Specificity and strength of retinogeniculate connections.

Authors:  W M Usrey; J B Reppas; R C Reid
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Burst and tonic firing in thalamic cells of unanesthetized, behaving monkeys.

Authors:  E J Ramcharan; J W Gnadt; S M Sherman
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Burst and tonic response modes in thalamic neurons during sleep and wakefulness.

Authors:  T G Weyand; M Boudreaux; W Guido
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Corticothalamic resonance, states of vigilance and mentation.

Authors:  M Steriade
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Synaptic interactions between thalamic inputs to simple cells in cat visual cortex.

Authors:  W M Usrey; J M Alonso; R C Reid
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  To burst, or rather, not to burst.

Authors:  M Steriade
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Encoding of visual information by LGN bursts.

Authors:  P Reinagel; D Godwin; S M Sherman; C Koch
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  38 in total

1.  The episodic nature of spike trains in the early visual pathway.

Authors:  Daniel A Butts; Gaëlle Desbordes; Chong Weng; Jianzhong Jin; Jose-Manuel Alonso; Garrett B Stanley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Open-loop organization of thalamic reticular nucleus and dorsal thalamus: a computational model.

Authors:  Adam M Willis; Bernard J Slater; Ekaterina D Gribkova; Daniel A Llano
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  mPFC spindle cycles organize sparse thalamic activation and recently active CA1 cells during non-REM sleep.

Authors:  Carmen Varela; Matthew A Wilson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Feedforward excitation and inhibition evoke dual modes of firing in the cat's visual thalamus during naturalistic viewing.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Yichun Wei; Vishal Vaingankar; Qingbo Wang; Kilian Koepsell; Friedrich T Sommer; Judith A Hirsch
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Inhibitory circuits for visual processing in thalamus.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Friedrich T Sommer; Judith A Hirsch
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Interspike interval analysis of retinal ganglion cell receptive fields.

Authors:  Daniel L Rathbun; Henry J Alitto; Theodore G Weyand; W Martin Usrey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Efficient inhibition of bursts by bursts in the auditory system of crickets.

Authors:  G Marsat; G S Pollack
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  State-dependent firing determines intrinsic dendritic Ca2+ signaling in thalamocortical neurons.

Authors:  Adam C Errington; John J Renger; Victor N Uebele; Vincenzo Crunelli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Theoretical analysis of reverse-time correlation for idealized orientation tuning dynamics.

Authors:  Gregor Kovacic; Louis Tao; David Cai; Michael J Shelley
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 10.  Emerging views of corticothalamic function.

Authors:  Farran Briggs; W Martin Usrey
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.