Literature DB >> 15647463

Semantic, typicality and odor representation: a cross-cultural study.

C Chrea1, D Valentin, C Sulmont-Rossé, D Hoang Nguyen, H Abdi.   

Abstract

This study investigated odor-category organization in three cultures by evaluating (i) the relationship between linguistic and perceptual categorization and (ii) the existence of an internal structure of odor categories. In the first experiment, three groups of 30 participants from American, French and Vietnamese cultures performed a sorting task. The first group sorted 40 odorants on the basis of odor similarity, the second group sorted 40 odor names on the basis of name similarity and the last group sorted 40 odor names on the basis of imagined odor similarity. Results showed that odor categorization was based on perceptual or conceptual similarity and was in part independent of word and imagined categorizations. In the second experiment, another group of 30 participants from each culture rated the typicality of the odorants for 11 odor categories. Results showed that some odorants were rated as more typical than others. Moreover, the typicality gradient predicted the odor space obtained in the odor sorting task in a consensual way among the three cultures. These results suggest that, as for other categories, odor categories are based on perceptual similarities rather than on semantic cues. Moreover odor-category structure might have a core representation which might be common to different cultures with boundaries which might be more culturally dependent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15647463     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjh255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  7 in total

1.  Predicting odor pleasantness with an electronic nose.

Authors:  Rafi Haddad; Abebe Medhanie; Yehudah Roth; David Harel; Noam Sobel
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Transitivity of odor preferences: constant and particularities in hedonic perception.

Authors:  Gérard Brand; Virginie Haaz; Laurence Jacquot
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Hedonic judgments of chemical compounds are correlated with molecular size.

Authors:  Manuel Zarzo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Animals can assign novel odours to a known category.

Authors:  Hannah F Wright; Anna Wilkinson; Ruth S Croxton; Deanna K Graham; Rebecca C Harding; Hayley L Hodkinson; Benjamin Keep; Nina R Cracknell; Helen E Zulch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Psycholinguistic variables matter in odor naming.

Authors:  John L A Huisman; Asifa Majid
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-05

6.  Rabbit neonates and human adults perceive a blending 6-component odor mixture in a comparable manner.

Authors:  Charlotte Sinding; Thierry Thomas-Danguin; Adeline Chambault; Noelle Béno; Thibaut Dosne; Claire Chabanet; Benoist Schaal; Gérard Coureaud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Quality-space theory in olfaction.

Authors:  Benjamin D Young; Andreas Keller; David Rosenthal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.