Literature DB >> 15646895

Infarct involution and improved function during healing of acute myocardial infarction: the role of microvascular obstruction.

C Joon Choi1, Shahriar Haji-Momenian, Joseph M Dimaria, Frederick H Epstein, Christina M Bove, Walter J Rogers, Christopher M Kramer.   

Abstract

Delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (ceCMR) delineates infarct size. The presence of hypoenhancement consistent with microvascular obstruction (MO) signifies larger infarcts with a worse prognosis. We hypothesized that the size of the contrast defect (CD) on ceCMR in acutely infarcted myocardium may change during infarct healing and depend upon the presence of MO. Twenty-five patients underwent CMR on weeks 1 and 8 after reperfused myocardial infarction. After short-axis cine CMR was performed, gadolinium was infused and ceCMR images and matched tagged cine MR images were obtained in the three most dysfunctional short-axis slices on cine CMR. The area and transmural extent of hyperenhancement (HE) with or without MO representing total CD size were planimetered. Between week 1 and week 8, the CD area fell from 1729+/-970 mm2 at week 1 to 1270+/-706 mm2 (p<0.001), as did the transmural extent of infarction (71+/-22% to 63+/-24%, p<0.001). The decline in CD trended to be higher in patients with MO (840+/-807 mm2) than in HE (312+/-485 mm2, p<0.07). In the patient group as a whole, ejection fraction (EF) improved (56+/-9% to 60+/-10%, p=0.002) between weeks 1 and 8, but patients with MO showed no increase in EF. Segments with some HE demonstrated partial functional improvement whereas no improvement was seen in HE+MO segments. In patients 8 weeks after reperfused myocardial infarction (MI), the size of infarction by ceCMR decreases compared to week 1 post-MI, especially in those with microvascular obstruction in whom there is little improvement in regional or global function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15646895     DOI: 10.1081/jcmr-200036206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  25 in total

Review 1.  Established and emerging cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the assessment of stable coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  David P Ripley; Manish Motwani; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-10

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Cardiac magnetic resonance versus SPECT: are all noninfarct myocardial regions created equal?

Authors:  Vasken Dilsizian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Prognosis following acute myocardial infarction: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Kevin J Duffy; Victor A Ferrari
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Scarred myocardium imposes additional burden on remote viable myocardium despite a reduction in the extent of area with late contrast MR enhancement.

Authors:  Maythem Saeed; Randall J Lee; Oliver Weber; Loi Do; Alastair Martin; Philip Ursell; David Saloner; Charles B Higgins
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  David Lin; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Imaging the myocardial ischemic cascade.

Authors:  Arthur E Stillman; Matthijs Oudkerk; David A Bluemke; Menko Jan de Boer; Jens Bremerich; Ernest V Garcia; Matthias Gutberlet; Pim van der Harst; W Gregory Hundley; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Dirkjan Kuijpers; Raymond Y Kwong; Eike Nagel; Stamatios Lerakis; John Oshinski; Jean-François Paul; Riemer H J A Slart; Vinod Thourani; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Rapid T1 quantification based on 3D phase sensitive inversion recovery.

Authors:  Marcel J B Warntjes; Johan Kihlberg; Jan Engvall
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Appearance of microvascular obstruction on high resolution first-pass perfusion, early and late gadolinium enhancement CMR in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Adam N Mather; Timothy Lockie; Eike Nagel; Michael Marber; Divaka Perera; Simon Redwood; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Ansuman Saha; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.