Mark R Ellis1, James D Campbell. 1. Cox Family Practice Residency Program, Springfield, MO, USA. mark.ellis@coxhealth.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to explore patients' views about discussing spiritual issues with primary care physicians, including perceived barriers to and facilitators of discussions. METHODS: The study was a qualitative, semistructured interview of 10 chronically or terminally ill patients who were deliberately selected to represent a range of demographic factors (religious background, age, sex). We coded each interview and evaluated interviews for themes through content analysis. RESULTS: Themes included rationale for addressing spiritual issues; prerequisites for these discussions; roles in spiritual discussions; principles of spiritual assessment; and barriers to and facilitators of spiritual discussions. Patients justified spiritual assessment on the basis of importance of spirituality in life and health. They asserted that patients must feel honored and respected by their physician to risk discussing spiritual issues. They affirmed that physicians are helpful when legitimizing their spiritual concerns. Citing physicians' neglect of spirituality as a barrier, they affirmed that spiritual assessment in the context of other life issues facilitates spiritual discussions. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' willingness to discuss spiritual issues may depend on their sense of physicians' respect for their spiritual views, attitudes about spiritual health, and qualities of openness and approachability.
OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to explore patients' views about discussing spiritual issues with primary care physicians, including perceived barriers to and facilitators of discussions. METHODS: The study was a qualitative, semistructured interview of 10 chronically or terminally ill patients who were deliberately selected to represent a range of demographic factors (religious background, age, sex). We coded each interview and evaluated interviews for themes through content analysis. RESULTS: Themes included rationale for addressing spiritual issues; prerequisites for these discussions; roles in spiritual discussions; principles of spiritual assessment; and barriers to and facilitators of spiritual discussions. Patients justified spiritual assessment on the basis of importance of spirituality in life and health. They asserted that patients must feel honored and respected by their physician to risk discussing spiritual issues. They affirmed that physicians are helpful when legitimizing their spiritual concerns. Citing physicians' neglect of spirituality as a barrier, they affirmed that spiritual assessment in the context of other life issues facilitates spiritual discussions. CONCLUSIONS:Patients' willingness to discuss spiritual issues may depend on their sense of physicians' respect for their spiritual views, attitudes about spiritual health, and qualities of openness and approachability.
Authors: Mieke Vermandere; Jan De Lepeleire; Liesbeth Smeets; Karin Hannes; Wouter Van Mechelen; Franca Warmenhoven; Eric van Rijswijk; Bert Aertgeerts Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 5.386