Literature DB >> 1564658

Secondary intraocular lens implantation in aphakia.

T W Hahn1, M S Kim, J H Kim.   

Abstract

We retrospectively studied secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in 165 aphakic patients (162 eyes) from May 1983 to August 1989. Seventy-five eyes (46.3%) had secondary IOL implantation; these included seven cases of trans-sulcus scleral fixation of the posterior chamber lens. The remaining 87 eyes could not have secondary IOL implantation because of the ocular conditions. The most common reason for secondary implantation was to relieve the discomfort caused by spectacles or contact lenses (56.2%). An anterior chamber lens was used in 43 eyes (57.3%) and a posterior chamber lens in 32 eyes (42.7%). Final postoperative visual acuity of 20/40 or better was achieved in 92.0% of the eyes with posterior chamber lenses, in 71.4% of the eyes with anterior chamber lenses, and in 57.1% of the eyes with scleral-fixated posterior chamber lenses. Endothelial cell loss was greater in the eyes with anterior chamber lenses than in the eyes with posterior chamber lenses. Of the cases that could be followed, 83.3% showed endothelial cell loss of less than 30% at six months postoperatively. Postoperative complications such as cystoid macular edema, persistent fibrinous membrane formation, and neovascular glaucoma occurred in only ten (13.3%) of the 75 eyes that had secondary implantation. These complications occurred more frequently in eyes that had anterior chamber lenses with anterior vitrectomy. There were no noticeable complications in the eyes that had trans-sulcus scleral fixation of posterior chamber lenses. Updrawn pupil, prolapsed vitreous, and peripheral anterior synechia were common conditions preventing secondary IOL implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1564658     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80927-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of outcomes of primary and secondary implantation of scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens.

Authors:  V Y W Lee; H K L Yuen; A K H Kwok
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Is scleral fixation a safe procedure for intraocular lens implantation?

Authors:  P Lanzetta; F M Bandello; G Virgili; S Crovato; U Menchini
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Transscleral fixation of closed loop haptic acrylic posterior chamber intraocular lens in aphakic nonvitrectomized eyes.

Authors:  Siddharth Agrawal; Vinita Singh; Sanjiv Kumar Gupta; Nibha Misra; Rajat M Srivastava
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Secondary IOL Implantation without Capsular Support: A Laser Flare Cell Meter Study.

Authors:  Mauro Cellini; Ernesto Strobbe; Pier Giorgio Toschi; Emilio C Campos
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-02

5.  Primary and secondary implantation of scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses in adult patients.

Authors:  Zuleyha Yalniz-Akkaya; Ayse Burcu; Guner O Uney; Iskan Abay; Umit Eksioglu; Mehmet Akif Acar; Firdevs Ornek
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar

6.  Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar; Satyaprakash Singh; Gyanendra Singh; Nilesh S Rajwade; Sushank A Bhalerao; Vinod Singh
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Sep-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.