Literature DB >> 15646219

Hardness and degree of conversion of posterior packable composites.

Lisa A Knobloch1, Ronald E Kerby, Nancy Clelland, Jeffrey Lee.   

Abstract

Knoop microhardness and the degree of conversion of three packable composites (SureFil, Alert and Solitaire), a microfil composite (Heliomolar), a microhybrid composite (Herculite) and an indirect laboratory-processed composite (Belleglass) were evaluated as a function of distance from the irradiated surface. Cylindrical specimens (5.0 mm [diameter] x 6.0 mm [length]) of each material were visible light cured for 60 seconds in black-backed Teflon molds and sectioned. Knoop microhardness values were then obtained at 0-, 2- and 4-mm using a 50-gram load and 20 second dwell time. Degree of conversion was determined using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. ANOVA (p<0.001) and Tukey Multiple Comparison Test (p<0.05) showed the indirect laboratory-processed composite Belleglass exhibited the highest mean values for both hardness and degree of conversion. Alert exhibited significantly greater hardness than SureFil and Solitaire at 0-mm depth. SureFil had significantly greater hardness than Alert at 4-mm depth. The degree of conversion of SureFil packable composite at 4-mm depth was significantly higher than any of the other direct composites tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15646219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  9 in total

1.  Micro-hardness evaluation of a micro-hybrid composite resin light cured with halogen light, light-emitting diode and argon ion laser.

Authors:  Katia M Rode; Patricia M de Freitas; Patricia R Lloret; Lynn G Powell; Miriam L Turbino
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  New Experimental Zirconia-Reinforced Rice Husk Nanohybrid Composite and the Outcome of Its Surface Roughness and Microhardness in Comparison with Commercialized Nanofilled and Microhybrid Composite Resins.

Authors:  Galvin Sim Siang Lin; Nik Rozainah Nik Abdul Ghani; Noor Huda Ismail; Kiran Singbal; Tahir Yusuf Noorani; Noraida Mamat
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2021-03-20

3.  Effect of cross infection control barriers used on the light-curing device tips on the cure depth of a resin composite.

Authors:  Isabel Cristina Celerino de Moraes Porto; Andréia Cristina Ramos de Brito; Abhishek Parolia
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-05

4.  Difference in the color stability of direct and indirect resin composites.

Authors:  Yong-Keun Lee; Bin Yu; Ho-Nam Lim; Jin Ik Lim
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  The effect of curing time by conventional quartz tungsten halogens and new light-emitting diodes light curing units on degree of conversion and microhardness of a nanohybrid resin composite.

Authors:  Saijai Tanthanuch; Boonlert Kukiattrakoon
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

6.  Conversion degrees of resin composites using different light sources.

Authors:  Bora Ozturk; Nevin Cobanoglu; Ali Rıza Cetin; Beniz Gunduz
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-01

7.  Comparison of time-dependent changes in the surface hardness of different composite resins.

Authors:  Suat Ozcan; Ihsan Yikilgan; Mine Betul Uctasli; Oya Bala; Zeliha Gonca Bek Kurklu
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-09

8.  Effect of resin thickness, and curing time on the micro-hardness of bulk-fill resin composites.

Authors:  Shaymaa M Nagi; Lamiaa M Moharam; Mohamed H Zaazou
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-12-01

9.  Effect of surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and evaluation of their microhardness.

Authors:  Ozge Gurbuz; Aylin Cilingir; Benin Dikmen; Alev Ozsoy; Meltem Mert Eren
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2020-01-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.