Literature DB >> 15645698

Benefits of an insulin dosage calculation device for adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Nicole S Glaser1, Sultanna B Iden, Dayna Green-Burgeson, Claire Bennett, Karen Hood-Johnson, Dennis M Styne, Beth Goodlin-Jones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Multiple daily injection insulin regimens (MDI) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) allow adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) meal flexibility, and may improve metabolic control. The insulin dosage calculations, however, involve ratios of insulin to carbohydrate and corrections for high blood glucose values, and are labor-intensive and prone to error. We evaluated the impact of an insulin dosage calculation device (IDC) on metabolic control, treatment satisfaction, regimen adherence and quality of life in adolescents using MDI or CSII. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a randomized control trial using the IDC in 83 adolescents on MDI or CSII. At enrollment, patients received training on dosage calculation using either the IDC or conventional methods, and performed sample calculations. At enrollment, 6 months and 12 months, we recorded HbA1c and frequency of hypoglycemia, and patients completed questionnaires assessing treatment satisfaction, regimen adherence and quality of life. After 6 months, patients in the control group were also given the IDC.
RESULTS: We observed a higher frequency of errors with conventional calculations (53-67% incorrect calculations) than with the IDC (25-32% incorrect). At 6 months, there was a trend toward improved HbA1c in the IDC group overall (9.3 vs 8.9, p = 0.07) and a significant improvement in the subset (42%) who used the IDC consistently (9.7 vs 8.8, p = 0.03). There was no change in HbA1c in the control group during this interval (9.0 vs 8.9, p = 0.90). During months 6-12, when both groups were combined, there was a significant increase in HbA1c in patients using the IDC inconsistently or not at all (8.9 vs 9.4, p = 0.005), but no change in HbA1c in those using the IDC consistently (9.1 vs 8.9, p = 0.57). Treatment satisfaction, adherence and quality of life improved throughout the study in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Errors in calculation of insulin dosage by adolescents occur frequently. Consistent use of an insulin dosage calculation device may help to improve metabolic control in adolescents using MDI or CSII.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15645698     DOI: 10.1515/jpem.2004.17.12.1641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0334-018X            Impact factor:   1.634


  11 in total

1.  Performance of a glucose meter with a built-in automated bolus calculator versus manual bolus calculation in insulin-using subjects.

Authors:  Allen Sussman; Elizabeth J Taylor; Mona Patel; Jeanne Ward; Shridhara Alva; Andrew Lawrence; Ronald Ng
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

2.  Self-Reported Views on Managing Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Mike Stedman; Rustam Rea; Christopher J Duff; Mark Livingston; Stephen Brown; Katherine Grady; Katie McLoughlin; Roger Gadsby; Angela Paisley; Anthony A Fryer; Adrian H Heald
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-05

3.  Bolus Calculator Safety Mandates a Need for Standards.

Authors:  John Walsh; Guido Freckmann; Ruth Roberts; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-20

Review 4.  Bolus calculators.

Authors:  Signe Schmidt; Kirsten Nørgaard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-19

Review 5.  Use of Automated Bolus Calculators for Diabetes Management.

Authors:  Frank L Schwartz; Cynthia R Marling
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2013-08-23

6.  Issues and Ideas in Bolus Advisor Research With Commentary on "A Methodology to Compare Insulin Dosing Algorithms in Real-Life Settings".

Authors:  John Walsh
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-07-06

7.  Glucose meters with built-in automated bolus calculator: gadget or real value for insulin-treated diabetic patients?

Authors:  Ides M Colin; Isabelle Paris
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 2.945

8.  A study of patient experience using a blood glucose meter with an in-built insulin dose calculator.

Authors:  Shenaz Ramtoola; Edward Jude; Anthony Robinson; Iqbal Malik; Gerrard Rayman; Cuong Dang; Graham David RossMartin; Amar Ali
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-12

9.  Use of an automated bolus calculator in MDI-treated type 1 diabetes: the BolusCal Study, a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Signe Schmidt; Merete Meldgaard; Nermin Serifovski; Camilla Storm; Tomas Møller Christensen; Birthe Gade-Rasmussen; Kirsten Nørgaard
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess carbohydrate and insulin-dosing knowledge in youth with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Michaela B Koontz; Leona Cuttler; Mark R Palmert; Maryann O'Riordan; Elaine A Borawski; Judy McConnell; Elizabeth O Kern
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 17.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.