GOALS OF WORK: Communication with parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer poses a number of problems, mostly due to the psychological effects of parental trauma. This study was designed to answer the following questions: How can we sustain the flow of communication with parents of children newly diagnosed with leukaemia so that it may become easier and more effective? What should we say to gather more reliable information from parents? How can we help empower their coping strategies? PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed 4880 conversational turns in individual conversations carried out between psychologists and 21 parents of children with leukaemia. The conversations were aimed at gathering information of the families' daily routines. Dialogues were audiotaped and fully transcribed. The type and frequency of speech acts present in each turn were coded along 18 categories by two independent judges (inter-rater agreement, Cohen Kappa =0.73). MAIN RESULTS: The parental speech acts expressing emotion in various ways go up to 58% of the total number of their speech acts. The lag-sequential analysis showed that such expressions are not associated with any of the interviewer's speech act. The same analysis showed that, by contrast, the interviewer's style has an effect upon the cognitive aspects of parents' conversation. Support of hope favoured parental ability to identify their coping strategies. Explicit requests, confirmations such as "sure" and key words summarizing parents' viewpoints are followed by parental factual and objective narratives. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, a few practical recommendations for health care professionals are given in order to better communicate with parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer.
GOALS OF WORK: Communication with parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer poses a number of problems, mostly due to the psychological effects of parental trauma. This study was designed to answer the following questions: How can we sustain the flow of communication with parents of children newly diagnosed with leukaemia so that it may become easier and more effective? What should we say to gather more reliable information from parents? How can we help empower their coping strategies? PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed 4880 conversational turns in individual conversations carried out between psychologists and 21 parents of children with leukaemia. The conversations were aimed at gathering information of the families' daily routines. Dialogues were audiotaped and fully transcribed. The type and frequency of speech acts present in each turn were coded along 18 categories by two independent judges (inter-rater agreement, Cohen Kappa =0.73). MAIN RESULTS: The parental speech acts expressing emotion in various ways go up to 58% of the total number of their speech acts. The lag-sequential analysis showed that such expressions are not associated with any of the interviewer's speech act. The same analysis showed that, by contrast, the interviewer's style has an effect upon the cognitive aspects of parents' conversation. Support of hope favoured parental ability to identify their coping strategies. Explicit requests, confirmations such as "sure" and key words summarizing parents' viewpoints are followed by parental factual and objective narratives. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, a few practical recommendations for health care professionals are given in order to better communicate with parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer.
Authors: Marta Tremolada; Sabrina Bonichini; Gianmarco Altoè; Marta Pillon; Modesto Carli; Thomas S Weisner Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-03-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Deena R Levine; Erik Liederbach; Liza-Marie Johnson; Erica C Kaye; Holly Spraker-Perlman; Belinda Mandrell; Michele Pritchard; April Sykes; Zhaohua Lu; Dave Wendler; Justin N Baker Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-01-02 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Adam D Wolfe; Sharon A Frierdich; Joel Wish; Joyce Kilgore-Carlin; Julie A Plotkin; Margo Hoover-Regan Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2014-06-27 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Kah Poh Loh; Supriya G Mohile; Jennifer L Lund; Ronald Epstein; Lianlian Lei; Eva Culakova; Colin McHugh; Megan Wells; Nikesha Gilmore; Mostafa R Mohamed; Charles Kamen; Valerie Aarne; Alison Conlin; James Bearden; Adedayo Onitilo; Marsha Wittink; William Dale; Arti Hurria; Paul Duberstein Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-04-23