Literature DB >> 15644779

Patterns of p53 mutations separate ovarian serous borderline tumors and low- and high-grade carcinomas and provide support for a new model of ovarian carcinogenesis: a mutational analysis with immunohistochemical correlation.

Gad Singer1, Robert Stöhr, Leslie Cope, Reiko Dehari, Arndt Hartmann, Deng-Fan Cao, Tian-Li Wang, Robert J Kurman, Ie-Ming Shih.   

Abstract

The infrequent association of serous borderline tumors (SBTs) with invasive serous carcinoma has led to the view that SBTs are unrelated to invasive serous carcinoma. Nonetheless, mortality associated with SBTs is generally attributed to malignant transformation, and traditionally these tumors have been designated as "carcinomas of low malignant potential." Previous immunohistochemical studies evaluating p53 expression and molecular genetic studies evaluating mutational status have reported that p53 overexpression and mutations are infrequent in SBTs and occur in as many as 50% to 80% of invasive serous carcinomas. The different methodologies for determining p53 status and the failure to correlate the findings with tumor grade make these studies difficult to interpret. The current study was undertaken to overcome these deficiencies and to reconcile the relationship of SBTs to invasive serous carcinoma by performing a morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic analysis comparing SBTs with low- and high-grade serous carcinoma. The molecular genetic analysis used a highly stringent, carefully designed nucleotide-sequencing method. A total of 96 sporadic serous tumors including 25 SBTs (11 atypical proliferative serous tumors and 14 intraepithelial low-grade serous carcinomas [noninvasive micropapillary serous carcinomas, MPSCs]), 12 low-grade serous carcinomas (invasive MPSCs), and 59 high-grade serous carcinomas were analyzed for their p53 mutational status of exons 5 to 9. Functional mutations, defined as mutations resulting in the alteration of the structure of the encoded protein, were detected in 30 of 59 (50.8%) high-grade serous carcinomas and 1 (8.3%) of 12 low-grade invasive serous carcinomas compared with 2 (8%) of 25 SBTs, both of these in intraepithelial low-grade serous carcinomas (noninvasive MPSCs). The similar frequency of p53 mutations in SBTs and low-grade invasive serous carcinomas in contrast to the significantly higher frequency of p53 mutations in high-grade serous carcinomas (P < 0.0005) suggests a common lineage for SBTs and low-grade invasive serous carcinomas and supports the view that SBTs are unrelated to the usual type of invasive serous carcinoma, which is a high-grade neoplasm. Mutational status was also correlated with p53 immunoreactivity. Although p53 immunoreactivity is generally higher in those specimens containing mutant p53, immunostaining is neither sufficiently specific nor sensitive enough to predict p53 mutations. The molecular genetic findings confirm our hypothesis of dual pathways of serous carcinogenesis based on previous analyses of KRAS and BRAF mutations on the same set of cases in which KRAS and BRAF mutations were found in 60% of SBTs and low-grade serous carcinoma but not in high-grade serous carcinomas. Based on these studies, we have proposed a model of serous carcinogenesis in which SBTs are the precursors of low-grade serous carcinomas whereas the usual type of invasive serous carcinoma is a high-grade neoplasm that develops "de novo" from in situ alterations in epithelial inclusion cysts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15644779     DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000146025.91953.8d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  128 in total

1.  Alterations in nuclear pore architecture allow cancer cell entry into or exit from drug-resistant dormancy.

Authors:  Yayoi Kinoshita; Tamara Kalir; Jamal Rahaman; Peter Dottino; D Stave Kohtz
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Association between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and survival in women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kelly L Bolton; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Cindy Goh; Siegal Sadetzki; Susan J Ramus; Beth Y Karlan; Diether Lambrechts; Evelyn Despierre; Daniel Barrowdale; Lesley McGuffog; Sue Healey; Douglas F Easton; Olga Sinilnikova; Javier Benítez; María J García; Susan Neuhausen; Mitchell H Gail; Patricia Hartge; Susan Peock; Debra Frost; D Gareth Evans; Rosalind Eeles; Andrew K Godwin; Mary B Daly; Ava Kwong; Edmond S K Ma; Conxi Lázaro; Ignacio Blanco; Marco Montagna; Emma D'Andrea; Maria Ornella Nicoletto; Sharon E Johnatty; Susanne Krüger Kjær; Allan Jensen; Estrid Høgdall; Ellen L Goode; Brooke L Fridley; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene; Phuong L Mai; Angela Chetrit; Flora Lubin; Galit Hirsh-Yechezkel; Gord Glendon; Irene L Andrulis; Amanda E Toland; Leigha Senter; Martin E Gore; Charlie Gourley; Caroline O Michie; Honglin Song; Jonathan Tyrer; Alice S Whittemore; Valerie McGuire; Weiva Sieh; Ulf Kristoffersson; Håkan Olsson; Åke Borg; Douglas A Levine; Linda Steele; Mary S Beattie; Salina Chan; Robert L Nussbaum; Kirsten B Moysich; Jenny Gross; Ilana Cass; Christine Walsh; Andrew J Li; Ronald Leuchter; Ora Gordon; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Simon A Gayther; Stephen J Chanock; Antonis C Antoniou; Paul D P Pharoah
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Knockdown of CIP2A sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Xiaoli Zhang; Bin Xu; Chuanying Sun; Liming Wang; Xia Miao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 4.  Role of p53 and Rb in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  David C Corney; Andrea Flesken-Nikitin; Jinhyang Choi; Alexander Yu Nikitin
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the TP53 region and susceptibility to invasive epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Joellen M Schildkraut; Ellen L Goode; Merlise A Clyde; Edwin S Iversen; Patricia G Moorman; Andrew Berchuck; Jeffrey R Marks; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise Brinton; Beata Peplonska; Julie M Cunningham; Robert A Vierkant; David N Rider; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Penelope M Webb; Jonathan Beesley; Xiaoqing Chen; Catherine Phelan; Rebecca Sutphen; Thomas A Sellers; Leigh Pearce; Anna H Wu; David Van Den Berg; David Conti; Christopher K Elund; Rebecca Anderson; Marc T Goodman; Galina Lurie; Michael E Carney; Pamela J Thompson; Simon A Gayther; Susan J Ramus; Ian Jacobs; Susanne Krüger Kjaer; Estrid Hogdall; Jan Blaakaer; Claus Hogdall; Douglas F Easton; Honglin Song; Paul D P Pharoah; Alice S Whittemore; Valerie McGuire; Lydia Quaye; Hoda Anton-Culver; Argyrios Ziogas; Kathryn L Terry; Daniel W Cramer; Susan E Hankinson; Shelley S Tworoger; Brian Calingaert; Stephen Chanock; Mark Sherman; Montserrat Garcia-Closas
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Coexistence of BRAF V600E and TERT Promoter Mutations in Low-grade Serous Carcinoma of Ovary Recurring as Carcinosarcoma in a Lymph Node: Report of a Case.

Authors:  Mahkam Tavallaee; David F Steiner; James L Zehnder; Ann K Folkins; Amer K Karam
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 7.  Ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen R Cho; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 23.472

8.  Validation of tissue microarray technology in ovarian cancer: results from the Nurses' Health Study.

Authors:  Jonathan L Hecht; Joanne Kotsopoulos; Margaret A Gates; Susan E Hankinson; Shelley S Tworoger
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Protein expression profiling identifies differential modulation of homologous recombination by platinum-based antitumor agents.

Authors:  Guangan He; Xiaolei Xie; Zahid H Siddik
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  The role of p53 as a surrogate marker for chemotherapeutical responsiveness in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Dirk O Bauerschlag; Christian Schem; Marion T Weigel; Constantin Von Kaisenberg; Alexander Strauss; Thomas Bauknecht; Nicolai Maass; Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.