Literature DB >> 15644668

Effect of cerebral perfusion pressure augmentation on regional oxygenation and metabolism after head injury.

Andrew J Johnston1, Luzius A Steiner, Jonathan P Coles, Doris A Chatfield, Tim D Fryer, Peter Smielewski, Peter J Hutchinson, Mark T O'Connell, Pippa G Al-Rawi, Franklin I Aigbirihio, John C Clark, John D Pickard, Arun K Gupta, David K Menon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study we have used O positron emission tomography, brain tissue oxygen monitoring, and cerebral microdialysis to assess the effects of cerebral perfusion pressure augmentation on regional physiology and metabolism in the setting of traumatic brain injury.
DESIGN: Prospective interventional study.
SETTING: Neurosciences critical care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Eleven acutely head-injured patients requiring norepinephrine to maintain cerebral perfusion pressure.
INTERVENTIONS: Using positron emission tomography, we have quantified the response to an increase in cerebral perfusion pressure in a region of interest around a brain tissue oxygen sensor (Neurotrend) and microdialysis catheter. Oxygen extraction fraction and cerebral blood flow were measured with positron emission tomography at a cerebral perfusion pressure of approximately 70 mm Hg and approximately 90 mm Hg using norepinephrine to control cerebral perfusion pressure. All other aspects of physiology were kept stable.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cerebral perfusion pressure augmentation resulted in a significant increase in brain tissue oxygen (17 +/- 8 vs. 22 +/- 8 mm Hg; 2.2 +/- 1.0 vs. 2.9 +/- 1.0 kPa, p < .001) and cerebral blood flow (27.5 +/- 5.1 vs. 29.7 +/- 6.0 mL/100 mL/min, p < .05) and a significant decrease in oxygen extraction fraction (33.4 +/- 5.9 vs. 30.3 +/- 4.6 %, p < .05). There were no significant changes in any of the microdialysis variables (glucose, lactate, pyruvate, lactate/pyruvate ratio, glycerol). There was a significant linear relationship between brain tissue oxygen and oxygen extraction fraction (r = .21, p < .05); the brain tissue oxygen value associated with an oxygen extraction fraction of 40% (the mean value for oxygen extraction fraction in normal controls) was 14 mm Hg (1.8 kPa). The cerebral perfusion pressure intervention resulted in a greater percentage increase in brain tissue oxygen than the percentage decrease in oxygen extraction fraction; this suggests that the oxygen gradients between the vascular and tissue compartments were reduced by the cerebral perfusion pressure intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral perfusion pressure augmentation significantly increased levels of brain tissue oxygen and significantly reduced regional oxygen extraction fraction. However, these changes did not translate into predictable changes in regional chemistry. Our results suggest that the ischemic level of brain tissue oxygen may lie at a level below 14 mm Hg (1.8 kPa); however, the data do not allow us to be more specific.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15644668     DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000149837.09225.bd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  42 in total

1.  Intra-arterial papaverine used to treat cerebral vasospasm reduces brain oxygen.

Authors:  Michael F Stiefel; Alejandro M Spiotta; Joshua D Udoetuk; Eileen Maloney-Wilensky; John B Weigele; Robert W Hurst; Peter D LeRoux
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Multimodal monitoring during emergency hemicraniectomy for vein of Labbe thrombosis.

Authors:  Rocco A Armonda; Alexander H Vo; Randy Bell; Christopher Neal; William W Campbell
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 3.  The physiology behind direct brain oxygen monitors and practical aspects of their use.

Authors:  Eileen Maloney-Wilensky; Peter Le Roux
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Comparison between cerebral tissue oxygen tension and energy metabolism in experimental subdural hematoma.

Authors:  Troels Halfeld Nielsen; Susanne I Engell; Rikke Aagaard Johnsen; Mette K Schulz; Oke Gerke; Jacob Hjelmborg; Palle Toft; Carl-Henrik Nordström
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Improvement of cerebral metabolism mediated by Ro5-4864 is associated with relief of intracranial pressure and mitochondrial protective effect in experimental brain injury.

Authors:  Jean F Soustiel; Eugene Vlodavsky; Felix Milman; Moshe Gavish; Menashe Zaaroor
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Detection of Brain Hypoxia Based on Noninvasive Optical Monitoring of Cerebral Blood Flow with Diffuse Correlation Spectroscopy.

Authors:  David R Busch; Ramani Balu; Wesley B Baker; Wensheng Guo; Lian He; Mamadou Diop; Daniel Milej; Venkaiah Kavuri; Olivia Amendolia; Keith St Lawrence; Arjun G Yodh; W Andrew Kofke
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 7.  Physiological monitoring of the severe traumatic brain injury patient in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Peter Le Roux
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.081

8.  Early derangements in oxygen and glucose metabolism following head injury: the ischemic penumbra and pathophysiological heterogeneity.

Authors:  M Giulia Abate; Monica Trivedi; Tim D Fryer; Piotr Smielewski; Doris A Chatfield; Guy B Williams; Franklin Aigbirhio; T Adrian Carpenter; John D Pickard; David K Menon; Jonathan P Coles
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 9.  Brain tissue oxygenation, lactate-pyruvate ratio, and cerebrovascular pressure reactivity monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury: systematic review and viewpoint.

Authors:  Christos Lazaridis; Charles M Andrews
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 10.  Methods of monitoring brain oxygenation.

Authors:  Ursula K Rohlwink; Anthony A Figaji
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.