Literature DB >> 15644273

Plastic changes in interhemispheric inhibition with practice of a two-hand force production task: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Jae Kun Shim1, Sun Wook Kim, Seung Ja Oh, Ning Kang, Vladimir M Zatsiorsky, Mark L Latash.   

Abstract

We studied the effects of practice of an unusual two-hand finger force production task on electromyographic and force responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Prior to practice, force production by a hand resulted in decreased TMS-induced responses in the other hand. After practice, fingers that were explicitly required to produce force during practice showed a significant drop in these inhibitory effects, while other fingers did not. We conclude that interhemispheric inhibitory projections can show plastic changes that favor the execution of a practiced task.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15644273      PMCID: PMC2826973          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.10.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  17 in total

1.  Inhibition of ipsilateral motor cortex during phasic generation of low force.

Authors:  J Liepert; C Dettmers; C Terborg; C Weiller
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Changes in motor cortex excitability during ipsilateral hand muscle activation in humans.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; S Facchini; B Boroojerdi; M Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Reduced interhemispheric inhibition in musicians.

Authors:  M C Ridding; B Brouwer; M A Nordstrom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Enhancing encoding of a motor memory in the primary motor cortex by cortical stimulation.

Authors:  Cathrin M Bütefisch; Vikram Khurana; Leonid Kopylev; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Learning multi-finger synergies: an uncontrolled manifold analysis.

Authors:  Ning Kang; Minoru Shinohara; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motor control in simple bimanual movements: a transcranial magnetic stimulation and reaction time study.

Authors:  H Foltys; R Sparing; B Boroojerdi; T Krings; I G Meister; F M Mottaghy; R Töpper
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; D Nguyet; L G Cohen; J P Brasil-Neto; A Cammarota; M Hallett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Facilitation of human first dorsal interosseous muscle responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during voluntary contraction of the contralateral homonymous muscle.

Authors:  A Stedman; N J Davey; P H Ellaway
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  Task-dependent changes of intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  J Liepert; J Classen; L G Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice.

Authors:  J Classen; J Liepert; S P Wise; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  13 in total

1.  Fundamental differences in callosal structure, neurophysiologic function, and bimanual control in young and older adults.

Authors:  B W Fling; R D Seidler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Task-dependent effects of interhemispheric inhibition on motor control.

Authors:  Brett W Fling; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Cortical activity predicts good variation in human motor output.

Authors:  Sarine Babikian; Eva Kanso; Jason J Kutch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Differential callosal contributions to bimanual control in young and older adults.

Authors:  Brett W Fling; Christine M Walsh; Ashley S Bangert; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Robert C Welsh; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Corticospinal and transcallosal modulation of unilateral and bilateral contractions of lower limbs.

Authors:  Jakob Škarabot; Ruben Perellón Alfonso; Neil Cronin; Jure Bon; Vojko Strojnik; Janne Avela
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Mechanisms controlling motor output to a transfer hand after learning a sequential pinch force skill with the opposite hand.

Authors:  Mickael Camus; Patrick Ragert; Yves Vandermeeren; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Finger force enslaving and surplus in spinal cord injury patients.

Authors:  Chang Kook Kim; Dae-Yeon Lee; You-Sin Kim; Junfeng Huang; Jaebum Park; Jae Kun Shim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Orlando B Swayne; Yves Vandermeeren; Mickael Camus; Michael A Dimyan; Michelle Harris-Love; Monica A Perez; Patrick Ragert; John C Rothwell; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Age and hemispheric differences in transcallosal inhibition between motor cortices: an ispsilateral silent period study.

Authors:  Travis Davidson; François Tremblay
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Movements that are both variable and optimal.

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.