Literature DB >> 15644246

Analysis of bacterial diversity in river biofilms using 16S rDNA PCR-DGGE: methodological settings and fingerprints interpretation.

Emilie Lyautey1, Bénédicte Lacoste, Loïc Ten-Hage, Jean-Luc Rols, Frédéric Garabetian.   

Abstract

Reliability of bacterial diversity assessment using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis of 16S rDNA fragments was evaluated for a particular complex microbial assemblage: river epilithic biofilm. By comparing 3 routine protocols on replicates of one river biofilm sample, we found that common DNA extraction procedures gave comparable diversity (from 28.0 to 30.7 bands detected) and community composition (> 75% of homology) despite differences in the total amount of extracted DNA (from 0.9 to 4.2 microg). Therefore methodological improvements only concerned electrophoretic separation of DNA fragments (range of denaturing gradient from 35% to 70% and migration time=18h) and standardisation of DNA amounts used (PCR-template=50 ng, gel loading=700 ng). Using such a standardised methodology we found a good reproducibility of all steps of the procedure. When an Escherichia coli strain was introduced as a contaminant in a biofilm sample, we were able to recover ribotypes from the strain. As concerns fields sampling, a satisfactory repeatability of banding patterns from neighbouring pebbles (sampling point) allowed discriminating between the biofilm intrasite variability (various points from a cross-profile). These trials confirmed that PCR-DGGE is suitable to assess a reliable genetic fingerprint of epilithic biofilms in the river. Phylogenetic analysis of 40 partial sequences of 16S rDNA from DGGE gels of two sets of river biofilms samples proved evidences for the retrieval of DNA fragments related to phototroph Eukarya. However, in both cases plastidial 16S rDNA represented less than 25% of the analysed operational taxonomic units. Taking into account that Cyanobacteria, as members of the Bacteria, were also detected, sequence analysis of relevant bands from the pattern is required to target "bacteria", i.e. the functional group of prokaryotic microorganisms to which one commonly refers as a key component in sustaining the nutrient turnover.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15644246     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.09.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  16 in total

1.  Bacterial community succession in natural river biofilm assemblages.

Authors:  Emilie Lyautey; Colin R Jackson; Jérôme Cayrou; Jean-Luc Rols; Frédéric Garabétian
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Effects of experimental choices and analysis noise on surveys of the "rare biosphere".

Authors:  Timothy J Hamp; W Joe Jones; Anthony A Fodor
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Description of freshwater bacterial assemblages from the upper paraná river floodpulse system, Brazil.

Authors:  Michael J Lemke; E Kurt Lienau; Jean Rothe; Thomaz A Pagioro; Jeff Rosenfeld; Rob Desalle
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Electroactivity of phototrophic river biofilms and constitutive cultivable bacteria.

Authors:  Emilie Lyautey; Amandine Cournet; Soizic Morin; Stéphanie Boulêtreau; Luc Etcheverry; Jean-Yves Charcosset; François Delmas; Alain Bergel; Frédéric Garabetian
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Impact of water quality on bacterioplankton assemblage along Cértima River Basin (central western Portugal) assessed by PCR-DGGE and multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Daniela R de Figueiredo; Raquel V Ferreira; Mário Cerqueira; Teresa Condesso de Melo; Mário J Pereira; Bruno B Castro; António Correia
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  High bacterial diversity in epilithic biofilms of oligotrophic mountain lakes.

Authors:  Mireia Bartrons; Jordi Catalan; Emilio O Casamayor
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 7.  Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Patricia M Fliss; Heike Martiny
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

8.  The Primary Research on the Gut Microbes in KKAy Mice.

Authors:  Yanqin Li; Liang Han; Ming Xu; Junjie Guo; Mali Feng; Xiaojiong Wang
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 2.461

9.  Microbial decomposer communities are mainly structured by trophic status in circumneutral and alkaline streams.

Authors:  Sofia Duarte; Cláudia Pascoal; Frédéric Garabétian; Fernanda Cássio; Jean-Yves Charcosset
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Influence of the natural growth environment on the sensitivity of phototrophic biofilm to herbicide.

Authors:  A Paule; A Lamy; V Roubeix; F Delmas; J L Rols
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.