Literature DB >> 15643199

Radical retropubic prostatectomy. How often do experienced surgeons have positive surgical margins when there is extraprostatic extension in the region of the neurovascular bundle?

David J Hernandez1, Jonathan I Epstein, Bruce J Trock, Toyonori Tsuzuki, H Ballentine Carter, Patrick C Walsh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined the frequency of positive surgical margins (PSMs) in patients with extraprostatic extension (EPE) in the region of the neurovascular bundle (NVB) who underwent open radical retropubic prostatectomy by 2 experienced surgeons.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 204 men with EPE in the region of the NVB underwent surgery by 2 experienced surgeons. The frequency of PSMs in the area of the NVB as well as the nerve sparing status of each lobe of the prostate were determined through a retrospective investigation of the pathology database as well as the physician's database. The recovery of sexual function was determined and compared to controls.
RESULTS: The age, clinical stage, biopsy Gleason sum and serum prostate specific antigen of the patients operated on by surgeons 1 and 2 were similar. Surgeon 1 widely excised at least 1 neurovascular bundle in 16% of the patients and surgeon 2 in 63%. The overall frequency of PSMs at the NVB was 5.9% for surgeon 1 and 5.8% for surgeon 2. Of the evaluable patients followed for 12 months or longer 83.5% of those operated on by surgeon 1 were potent compared to 63.8% of those operated on by surgeon 2.
CONCLUSIONS: Visual and tactile assessment during open surgery by an experienced surgeon provides valuable information on when and where it is safe to preserve the neurovascular bundle in patients with EPE in the region of the NVB. Surgical approaches in which tactile sensation is muted or absent, laparoscopic and robotic, need to undergo a similar evaluation to determine whether magnification of the operative field is sufficient to overcome the lack of haptic feedback and ability to palpate the tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15643199     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000151135.80249.c9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

1.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

2.  Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Mark L Gonzalgo; Li-Ming Su; Thomas J Guzzo; George Netto; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  Function-preserving surgery for urologic cancer.

Authors:  Kenichi Tobisu
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Location, extent, and multifocality of positive surgical margins for biochemical recurrence prediction after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Sarah J Drouin; Julie Rode; Yves Allory; Dimitri Vordos; Andras Hoznek; Claude-Clément Abbou; Alexandre de la Taille; Laurent Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Preoperative nomograms for predicting extracapsular extension in Korean men with localized prostate cancer: a multi-institutional clinicopathologic study.

Authors:  Jae Seung Chung; Han Yong Choi; Hae-Ryoung Song; Seok-Soo Byun; Seong il Seo; Cheryn Song; Jin Seon Cho; Sang Eun Lee; Hanjong Ahn; Eun Sik Lee; Won-Jae Kim; Moon Kee Chung; Tae Young Jung; Ho Song Yu; Young Deuk Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Comparison of surgical technique (open vs. laparoscopic) on pathological and long term functional outcomes following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Jonas Busch; Natalia Leva; Mark Schrader; Serdar Deger; Kurt Miller; Michael Lein
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Surgical management of neurovascular bundle in uterine fibroid pseudocapsule.

Authors:  Andrea Tinelli; Antonio Malvasi; Brad S Hurst; Daniel A Tsin; Fausto Davila; Guillermo Dominguez; Domenico Dell'edera; Carlo Cavallotti; Roberto Negro; Sarah Gustapane; Chris M Teigland; Liselotte Mettler
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.