BACKGROUND: People of Black African descent have increased risks of vascular target-organ damage not explained by greater blood pressures. OBJECTIVE: To study ethnic differences in the microvasculature. DESIGN AND METHODS: Flow (flux) in microcirculatory skin vessels was assessed using laser Doppler fluximetry in 181 Afro-Caribbean and European men and women aged 40-65 years from the general population in London, UK. Flux in response to maximal heating (maximal hyperaemic response) was measured and minimum vascular resistance calculated. Peak flux and time to peak after an ischaemic stimulus were also measured. Target-organ damage was assessed using echocardiographic interventricular septal thickness (IVST). RESULTS: In men, maximum hyperaemic response was attenuated in Afro-Caribbeans [109 arbitrary units (au), 25th and 75th percentiles 101, 117] compared with Europeans [165 (155, 179) au; P = 0.008]. Minimum vascular resistance was greater in Afro-Caribbeans, significantly so in men [(1.22 (1.18, 1.28) au/mmHg compared with 0.80 (0.77, 0.83) au/mmHg; P = 0.006]. Peak ischaemic response was attenuated in Afro-Caribbean men and women compared with Europeans (35.6 au compared with 49.5 au; P < 0.001) and time to peak was prolonged (14.1 s compared with 12.5 s; P = 0.07). These ethnic differences could not be accounted for by standard cardiovascular risk factors. IVST was greater in Afro-Caribbeans than in Europeans. Minimum vascular resistance and peak response accounted for a small proportion of this ethnic difference, in addition to conventional factors. CONCLUSIONS: Afro-Caribbeans have poorer microvascular structure and function, unexplained by conventional risk factors, which may contribute to greater rates of vascular target-organ damage.
BACKGROUND:People of Black African descent have increased risks of vascular target-organ damage not explained by greater blood pressures. OBJECTIVE: To study ethnic differences in the microvasculature. DESIGN AND METHODS: Flow (flux) in microcirculatory skin vessels was assessed using laser Doppler fluximetry in 181 Afro-Caribbean and European men and women aged 40-65 years from the general population in London, UK. Flux in response to maximal heating (maximal hyperaemic response) was measured and minimum vascular resistance calculated. Peak flux and time to peak after an ischaemic stimulus were also measured. Target-organ damage was assessed using echocardiographic interventricular septal thickness (IVST). RESULTS: In men, maximum hyperaemic response was attenuated in Afro-Caribbeans [109 arbitrary units (au), 25th and 75th percentiles 101, 117] compared with Europeans [165 (155, 179) au; P = 0.008]. Minimum vascular resistance was greater in Afro-Caribbeans, significantly so in men [(1.22 (1.18, 1.28) au/mmHg compared with 0.80 (0.77, 0.83) au/mmHg; P = 0.006]. Peak ischaemic response was attenuated in Afro-Caribbean men and women compared with Europeans (35.6 au compared with 49.5 au; P < 0.001) and time to peak was prolonged (14.1 s compared with 12.5 s; P = 0.07). These ethnic differences could not be accounted for by standard cardiovascular risk factors. IVST was greater in Afro-Caribbeans than in Europeans. Minimum vascular resistance and peak response accounted for a small proportion of this ethnic difference, in addition to conventional factors. CONCLUSIONS: Afro-Caribbeans have poorer microvascular structure and function, unexplained by conventional risk factors, which may contribute to greater rates of vascular target-organ damage.
Authors: Tien Yin Wong; F M Amirul Islam; Ronald Klein; Barbara E K Klein; Mary Frances Cotch; Cecilia Castro; A Richey Sharrett; Eyal Shahar Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Shengxu Li; Wei Chen; Miaoying Yun; Camilo Fernandez; Marie Krousel-Wood; Larry Webber; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Gerald S Berenson Journal: Am J Med Sci Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 2.378
Authors: Stephen T Turner; Andrew D Rule; Gary L Schwartz; Iftikhar J Kullo; Thomas H Mosley; Clifford R Jack; Sharon L R Kardia; Eric Boerwinkle; Kent R Bailey Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: K M Gooding; J E Tooke; H von Lany; M Mitra; R Ling; C I Ball; D Mawson; K Skinner; A C Shore Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2010-06-06 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Amy S Shah; Zhiqian Gao; Lawrence M Dolan; Dana Dabelea; Ralph B D'Agostino; Elaine M Urbina Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Keith C Ferdinand; James Pool; Richard Weitzman; Das Purkayastha; Raymond Townsend Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: William D Strain; Alun D Hughes; Jamil Mayet; Andrew R Wright; Jaspal Kooner; Nish Chaturvedi; Angela C Shore Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 2.298