Literature DB >> 15642689

Duration of mentally simulated movement: a review.

A Guillot1, C Collet.   

Abstract

The authors review studies of mentally simulated movements. In automatic or cyclical movements, actual and motor imagery (MI) durations are similar. When athletes simulate only dynamic phases of movement or perform MI just before competing, however, environmental and time constraints lead to an underestimation of actual duration. Conversely, complex attention-demanding movements take longer to image. Finally, participants can modify the speed of MI voluntarily when they receive specific instructions. To complete the available data, the authors compared imagined and actual durations in tennis and gymnastics. Results showed systematic and disproportionate overestimation of actual duration. The authors found a relationship between complex motor skills and MI duration. They discuss the factors leading to over- and underestimation and the hypotheses that could be tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15642689     DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.37.1.10-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  70 in total

1.  Motor imagery in typing: effects of typing style and action familiarity.

Authors:  Martina Rieger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

2.  The influence of individual motor imagery ability on cerebral recruitment during gait imagery.

Authors:  Marian van der Meulen; Gilles Allali; Sebastian W Rieger; Frédéric Assal; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Aymeric Guillot; Christian Collet; Vo An Nguyen; Francine Malouin; Carol Richards; Julien Doyon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Action observation improves motor imagery: specific interactions between simulative processes.

Authors:  Massimiliano Conson; Marco Sarà; Francesca Pistoia; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Misperceiving the speed-accuracy tradeoff: imagined movements and perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Scott J Young; Jay Pratt; Tom Chau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motor imagery effectiveness for mirror reversed movements.

Authors:  Ursula Debarnot; Gaetano Valenza; Stéphane Champely; Enzo Pasquale Scilingo; Danilo De Rossi; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  The influence of imagery capacity in motor performance improvement.

Authors:  Célia Ruffino; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Florent Lebon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Tool characteristics in imagery of tool actions.

Authors:  Martina Rieger; Cristina Massen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-02-07

9.  Imagined self-motion differs from perceived self-motion: evidence from a novel continuous pointing method.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; Joshua H Siegle; Betty J Mohler; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Discrete and effortful imagined movements do not specifically activate the autonomic nervous system.

Authors:  Laurent Demougeot; Hervé Normand; Pierre Denise; Charalambos Papaxanthis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.