Literature DB >> 15640631

The effect of drotrecogin alfa (activated) on long-term survival after severe sepsis.

Derek C Angus1, Pierre-Francois Laterre, Jeff Helterbrand, E Wesley Ely, Daniel E Ball, Rekha Garg, Lisa A Weissfeld, Gordon R Bernard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine long-term survival for subjects with severe sepsis enrolled in the previous multiple-center trial (PROWESS) of drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA) vs. placebo.
DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional, blinded follow-up of subjects enrolled in a previous randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: One hundred sixty-four tertiary care institutions in 11 countries. PARTICIPANTS: The 1,690 subjects with severe sepsis enrolled and treated with study drug in PROWESS, of whom 1,220 were alive at 28 days (the end of the original PROWESS follow-up).
INTERVENTIONS: DrotAA (n = 850), 24 mug/kg/hr for 96 hrs, or placebo (n = 840).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Long-term survival data were collected. We had follow-up information on 100% of subjects at 28 days, 98% at hospital discharge, 94% at 3 months, and 93% at 1 yr. The longest follow-up was 3.6 yrs. Hospital survival was higher with DrotAA vs. placebo (70.3% vs. 65.1%, p = .03). There was no statistically significant difference in duration of survival time or in landmark survival rates in subjects who received DrotAA compared with those who received placebo (median duration of survival = 1113 days vs. 846 days for DrotAA vs. placebo, p = .10; landmark survival rates for DrotAA vs. placebo, 66.1% vs. 62.4% at 3 months [p = .11], 62.2% vs. 60.3% at 6 months [p = .44], 58.9% vs. 57.2% at 1 yr [p = .49], and 52.6% vs. 49.3% at 2(1/2) yrs [p = .21]). There was a significant interaction (p = .0008) between treatment assignment and baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores, suggesting qualitative differences in treatment effect with severity of illness. Subjects with APACHE II >/=25 had better survival time with DrotAA (median duration of survival: 450 vs. 71 days, p =.0005). Survival rates were also higher at landmark time points (DrotAA vs. placebo, 58.9% vs. 48.4% at 3 months [p = .003], 55.2% vs. 45.3% at 6 months [p = .005], 52.1% vs. 41.3% at 1 yr [p = .002], and 45.6% vs. 33.8% at 2(1/2) yrs [p = .001]). In the APACHE II <25 group there was no significant difference in survival time or survival rates at landmark time points except at 1 yr (DrotAA vs. placebo, 65.5% vs. 72.0% at 1 yr, p = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: The acute survival benefit observed in subjects with severe sepsis who received DrotAA persists to hospital discharge. The survival benefit loses statistical significance thereafter. Post hoc analysis suggests the effect of DrotAA varies by APACHE II score with improved long-term survival in subjects with APACHE II scores >/=25 but no benefit in those with lower scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15640631      PMCID: PMC4714718          DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000145228.62451.f6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  37 in total

Review 1.  New strategies for clinical trials in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  J Cohen; G Guyatt; G R Bernard; T Calandra; D Cook; D Elbourne; J Marshall; A Nunn; S Opal
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 2.  The protein C anticoagulant pathway.

Authors:  C T Esmon
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb       Date:  1992-02

3.  Mortality associated with late-onset pneumonia in the intensive care unit: results of a multi-center cohort study.

Authors:  Pierre Moine; Jean-François Timsit; Arnaud De Lassence; Gilles Troché; Jean-Philippe Fosse; Corrine Alberti; Yves Cohen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Magnitude and duration of the effect of sepsis on survival. Department of Veterans Affairs Systemic Sepsis Cooperative Studies Group.

Authors:  A A Quartin; R M Schein; D H Kett; P N Peduzzi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Cost-effectiveness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in the treatment of severe sepsis.

Authors:  Derek C Angus; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; Gilles Clermont; Daniel E Ball; Bruce R Basson; E Wesley Ely; Pierre-Francois Laterre; Jean-Louis Vincent; Gordon Bernard; Ben van Hout
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Drotrecogin alfa (activated) administration across clinically important subgroups of patients with severe sepsis.

Authors:  E Wesley Ely; Pierre-François Laterre; Derek C Angus; Jeffrey D Helterbrand; Howard Levy; Jean-François Dhainaut; Jean-Louis Vincent; William L Macias; Gordon R Bernard
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  EPISEPSIS: a reappraisal of the epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis in French intensive care units.

Authors:  C Brun-Buisson; P Meshaka; P Pinton; B Vallet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  A measure of primary sociobiological functions.

Authors:  S Katz; C A Akpom
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.663

9.  The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee.

Authors:  J L Vincent; D J Bihari; P M Suter; H A Bruining; J White; M H Nicolas-Chanoin; M Wolff; R C Spencer; M Hemmer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Variation in sepsis care: a wake-up call.

Authors:  Mary E Hartman; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  41 in total

1.  Activated protein C: do more survive?

Authors:  Alasdair F Mackenzie
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Surviving sepsis-but for how long?

Authors:  Peter Dodek
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  [New approaches to intensive care for sepsis].

Authors:  G Marx; T Schuerholz; K Reinhart
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Studying outcomes of intensive care unit survivors: measuring exposures and outcomes.

Authors:  Dale M Needham; David W Dowdy; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Margaret S Herridge; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-05-21       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Activated protein C: do more survive?

Authors:  William L Macias
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Prognostic factors in critically ill patients suffering from secondary peritonitis: a retrospective, observational, survival time analysis.

Authors:  Christian P Schneider; Carol Seyboth; Markus Vilsmaier; Helmut Küchenhoff; Benjamin Hofner; Karl-Walter Jauch; Wolfgang H Hartl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Reporting data on long-term follow-up of critical care trials.

Authors:  May Hua; Hannah Wunsch
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  8 Inhibitors.

Authors: 
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.747

9.  Long-term outcomes in patients with severe sepsis randomised to resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 or Ringer's acetate.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Nicolai Haase; Per Winkel; Anne B Guttormsen; Jyrki Tenhunen; Gudmundur Klemenzson; Rasmus G Müller; Anders Aneman; Jørn Wetterslev
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  [Diagnosis and therapy of sepsis. Guidelines of the German Sepsis Society Inc. and the German Interdisciplinary Society for Intensive and Emergency Medicine].

Authors:  K Reinhart; F Brunkhorst; H Bone; H Gerlach; M Gründling; G Kreymann; P Kujath; G Marggraf; K Mayer; A Meier-Hellmann; C Peckelsen; C Putensen; M Quintel; M Ragaller; R Rossaint; F Stüber; N Weiler; T Welte; K Werdan
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.