BACKGROUND: A major portion of the catechins in green tea is not absorbed in the small intestine. Bacteria in the colon convert nonabsorbed catechins into simpler phenolic compounds, which may also be absorbed. During the production of black tea, most catechins are polymerized to complex molecules called thearubigins. Little is known about the microbial degradation of these complex polyphenols, but hippuric acid has been identified as a major excretion product associated with black tea consumption. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether green tea and black tea have the same metabolic fate in humans. DESIGN:Seventeen healthy male volunteers were studied with a randomized, full-crossover design. Each intervention period lasted 4 d, ie, a 2-d run-in period with a low-polyphenol diet followed by a 2-d treatment period. Volunteers consumed a daily dose of 6 g green tea solids, 6 g black tea solids, or 360 mg caffeine. Intervention periods were separated by a 10-d washout period. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected during the second day of each treatment period. Hippuric acid was analyzed with HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The mean excretion of urinary hippuric acid during black tea and green tea consumption was 3.75 +/- 0.28 mmol/24 h and 4.22 +/- 0.28 mmol/24 h, respectively (95% CI for the difference: -0.37 to +1.30 mmol/24 h). The hippuric acid excretion during the control treatment was much lower (1.89 +/- 0.28 mmol/24 h; P < 0.0001, compared with both black tea and green tea). CONCLUSION: The ingestion of either green tea or black tea results in a major increase in the excretion of hippuric acid into urine.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: A major portion of the catechins in green tea is not absorbed in the small intestine. Bacteria in the colon convert nonabsorbed catechins into simpler phenolic compounds, which may also be absorbed. During the production of black tea, most catechins are polymerized to complex molecules called thearubigins. Little is known about the microbial degradation of these complex polyphenols, but hippuric acid has been identified as a major excretion product associated with black tea consumption. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether green tea and black tea have the same metabolic fate in humans. DESIGN: Seventeen healthy male volunteers were studied with a randomized, full-crossover design. Each intervention period lasted 4 d, ie, a 2-d run-in period with a low-polyphenol diet followed by a 2-d treatment period. Volunteers consumed a daily dose of 6 g green tea solids, 6 g black tea solids, or 360 mg caffeine. Intervention periods were separated by a 10-d washout period. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected during the second day of each treatment period. Hippuric acid was analyzed with HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The mean excretion of urinary hippuric acid during black tea and green tea consumption was 3.75 +/- 0.28 mmol/24 h and 4.22 +/- 0.28 mmol/24 h, respectively (95% CI for the difference: -0.37 to +1.30 mmol/24 h). The hippuric acid excretion during the control treatment was much lower (1.89 +/- 0.28 mmol/24 h; P < 0.0001, compared with both black tea and green tea). CONCLUSION: The ingestion of either green tea or black tea results in a major increase in the excretion of hippuric acid into urine.
Authors: Lone G Rasmussen; Hanne Winning; Francesco Savorani; Christian Ritz; Søren B Engelsen; Arne Astrup; Thomas M Larsen; Lars O Dragsted Journal: Genes Nutr Date: 2011-10-09 Impact factor: 5.523
Authors: Pavel A Aronov; Frank J-G Luo; Natalie S Plummer; Zhe Quan; Susan Holmes; Thomas H Hostetter; Timothy W Meyer Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-07-22 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Mei Chung; Naisi Zhao; Deena Wang; Marissa Shams-White; Micaela Karlsen; Aedín Cassidy; Mario Ferruzzi; Paul F Jacques; Elizabeth J Johnson; Taylor C Wallace Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Fayth L Miles; Sandi L Navarro; Yvonne Schwarz; Haiwei Gu; Danijel Djukovic; Timothy W Randolph; Ali Shojaie; Mario Kratz; Meredith A J Hullar; Paul D Lampe; Marian L Neuhouser; Daniel Raftery; Johanna W Lampe Journal: Food Funct Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Mary F Chong; Trevor W George; Dauren Alimbetov; Yannan Jin; Michelle Weech; Anna L Macready; Jeremy P E Spencer; Orla B Kennedy; Anne-Marie Minihane; Michael H Gordon; Julie A Lovegrove Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: T Tapiainen; H Jauhiainen; L Jaakola; J Salo; J Sevander; I Ikäheimo; A M Pirttilä; A Hohtola; M Uhari Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2011-08-07 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Benjamin F Bitner; Jason D Ray; Kyle B Kener; Jacob A Herring; Josie A Tueller; Deborah K Johnson; Claudia M Tellez Freitas; Dane W Fausnacht; Mitchell E Allen; Alexander H Thomson; K Scott Weber; Ryan P McMillan; Matthew W Hulver; David A Brown; Jeffery S Tessem; Andrew P Neilson Journal: J Nutr Biochem Date: 2018-09-15 Impact factor: 6.048
Authors: Astrid M Suchy-Dicey; Thomas Laha; Andrew Hoofnagle; Rick Newitt; Tammy L Sirich; Timothy W Meyer; Ken E Thummel; N David Yanez; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Noel S Weiss; Bryan R Kestenbaum Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-11-27 Impact factor: 10.121