Literature DB >> 15640260

Patients' preferences in deciding between intrauterine insemination and expectant management.

Pieternel Steures1, Jidske C Berkhout, Peter G A Hompes, Jan Willem van der Steeg, Patrick M M Bossuyt, Fulco van der Veen, J Dik F Habbema, Marinus J C Eijkemans, Ben W J Mol.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a commonly used treatment in subfertile couples. We assessed patients' preferences for IUI relative to expectant management.
METHODS: Forty subfertile couples were offered scenarios in which the treatment-independent pregnancy chance was varied against a fixed pregnancy chance after IUI without or with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) of 8% and 12% per cycle, respectively. The treatment-independent pregnancy chance within 12 months was initially set at 100%, and subsequently reduced until couples switched preferences. We also investigated the impact of the risks of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and multiple pregnancy on couples' preferences.
RESULTS: When pregnancy was guaranteed within a year, all couples would opt for expectant management. Most couples switched to IUI without COH at a 60% chance of a treatment-independent pregnancy and to IUI with COH between a 40% and 60% chance. Where the risk of OHSS was set at 10%, a large majority of the couples preferred expectant management to IUI. At a multiple pregnancy risk of 100%, 77% of the couples would still prefer IUI.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of couples prefer IUI with or without COH when the treatment-independent pregnancy chance in the next 12 months is <50% and <40%, respectively. The risk of a multiple pregnancy does not affect their preference for IUI, whereas IUI is rejected when the risk of OHSS exceeds 10%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15640260     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  2 in total

1.  Women's perspectives on ovulation induction with or without IUI as treatment for normogonadotrophic anovulation: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  N S Weiss; A M F Schreurs; F van der Veen; P G A Hompes; C B Lambalk; B W Mol; M van Wely
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2017-11-23

2.  The needs of subfertile couples continuing to attempt natural conception: in-depth interviews.

Authors:  Felicia Dreischor; Ellen T M Laan; Fleur Peeters; Karen Peeraer; Cornelis B Lambalk; Mariëtte Goddijn; Inge M Custers; Eline A F Dancet
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-09-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.