Literature DB >> 15640254

Predictors for treatment failure after laparoscopic electrocautery of the ovaries in women with clomiphene citrate resistant polycystic ovary syndrome.

Madelon van Wely1, Neriman Bayram, Fulco van der Veen, Patrick M M Bossuyt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic electrocautery has been put forward as the treatment of choice in women with clomiphene citrate (CC)-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). In order to make an informed treatment decision it would be helpful if we could identify women with PCOS with a high probability of treatment failure following electrocautery of the ovaries.
METHODS: Eighty-three women with CC-resistant PCOS were allocated to receive laparoscopic electrocautery followed by CC when anovulation persisted as part of a randomized controlled trial. Multivariable logistic regression analyses using clinical, ultrasonographic and endocrinological parameters were performed to predict (i) failure to ovulate within 8 weeks after electrocautery, and (ii) failure to reach an ongoing pregnancy after electrocautery with or without CC.
RESULTS: Of the 83 women, 56 (67%) ovulated within 8 weeks after electrocautery. The model for predicting anovulation after electrocautery included LH/FSH rate, year of menarche and glucose level. Women who were younger at menarche, had a lower LH/FSH ratio and a lower glucose level were more likely to have persistent anovulation. The area under the curve was 0.74. After electrocautery and CC, 41 women reached an ongoing pregnancy. No prognostic parameters could be identified to predict failure to reach an ongoing pregnancy after electrocautery followed by CC.
CONCLUSIONS: Persistence of anovulation after electrocautery could be predicted and women with a high risk of persisting anovulation could be distinguished. We were, however, not able to predict treatment failure after electrocautery followed by CC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15640254     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  6 in total

1.  Anovulation and ovulation induction.

Authors:  I Katsikis; M Kita; A Karkanaki; N Prapas; D Panidis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Hormonal Changes After Laparoscopic Ovarian Diathermy in Patients with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome.

Authors:  Elsayed A Elnaggar; Youssef Abo Elwan; Safaa A Ibrahim; Mena M Abdalla
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-04-13

Review 3.  Laparoscopic ovarian drilling: An alternative but not the ultimate in the management of polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Subarna Mitra; Prasanta Kumar Nayak; Sarita Agrawal
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

4.  Decrease in serum anti-Müllerian hormone level per puncture with laparoscopic ovarian drilling using ultrasonically activated device.

Authors:  Shuichi Ogawa; Yusuke Atsuki; Kazuhiko Shimada; Mitsuhiro Motoyama; Tatsuya Suzuki; Hiroyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2021-07-31

Review 5.  Ovarian Drilling in PCOS: Is it Really Useful?

Authors:  Issam Lebbi; Riadh Ben Temime; Anis Fadhlaoui; Anis Feki
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

6.  Ovarian drilling in polycystic ovary syndrome: Long term pregnancy rate.

Authors:  E Debras; H Fernandez; M-E Neveu; X Deffieux; P Capmas
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-08-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.