Literature DB >> 15640182

Activity and diversity of methanogens in a petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer.

Jutta Kleikemper1, Silvina A Pombo, Martin H Schroth, William V Sigler, Manuel Pesaro, Josef Zeyer.   

Abstract

Methanogenic activity was investigated in a petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer by using a series of four push-pull tests with acetate, formate, H(2) plus CO(2), or methanol to target different groups of methanogenic Archaea. Furthermore, the community composition of methanogens in water and aquifer material was explored by molecular analyses, i.e., fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of 16S rRNA genes amplified with the Archaea-specific primer set ARCH915 and UNI-b-rev, and sequencing of DNA from dominant DGGE bands. Molecular analyses were subsequently compared with push-pull test data. Methane was produced in all tests except for a separate test where 2-bromoethanesulfonate, a specific inhibitor of methanogens, was added. Substrate consumption rates were 0.11 mM day(-1) for methanol, 0.38 mM day(-1) for acetate, 0.90 mM day(-1) for H(2), and 1.85 mM day(-1) for formate. Substrate consumption and CH(4) production during all tests suggested that at least three different physiologic types of methanogens were present: H(2) plus CO(2) or formate, acetate, and methanol utilizers. The presence of 15 to 20 bands in DGGE profiles indicated a diverse archaeal population. High H(2) and formate consumption rates agreed with a high diversity of methanogenic Archaea consuming these substrates (16S rRNA gene sequences related to several members of the Methanomicrobiaceae) and the detection of Methanomicrobiaceae by using FISH (1.4% of total DAPI [4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole]-stained microorganisms in one water sample; probe MG1200). Considerable acetate consumption agreed with the presence of sequences related to the obligate acetate degrader Methanosaeata concilii and the detection of this species by FISH (5 to 22% of total microorganisms; probe Rotcl1). The results suggest that both aceticlastic and CO(2)-type substrate-consuming methanogens are likely involved in the terminal step of hydrocarbon degradation, while methanogenesis from methanol plays a minor role. DGGE profiles further indicate similar archaeal community compositions in water and aquifer material. The combination of hydrogeological and molecular methods employed in this study provide improved information on the community and the potential activity of methanogens in a petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15640182      PMCID: PMC544196          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.1.149-158.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  38 in total

1.  Molecular characterization of a toluene-degrading methanogenic consortium.

Authors:  M Ficker; K Krastel; S Orlicky; E Edwards
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparison of extracellular enzyme activities and community composition of attached and free-living bacteria in porous medium columns.

Authors:  R Michael Lehman; Seán P O'Connell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Distribution of Microbial Physiologic Types in an Aquifer Contaminated by Crude Oil.

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Quantification of methanogenic groups in anaerobic biological reactors by oligonucleotide probe hybridization.

Authors:  L Raskin; L K Poulsen; D R Noguera; B E Rittmann; D A Stahl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Methanotrophic bacteria.

Authors:  R S Hanson; T E Hanson
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1996-06

6.  Fate of the biological control agent Pseudomonas aureofaciens TX-1 after application to turfgrass.

Authors:  W V Sigler; C H Nakatsu; Z J Reicher; R F Turco
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Attached and unattached bacterial communities in a 120-meter corehole in an acidic, crystalline rock aquifer.

Authors:  R M Lehman; F F Roberto; D Earley; D F Bruhn; S E Brink; S P O'Connell; M E Delwiche; F S Colwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Use of alcohol oxidase to measure the methanol produced during the hydrolysis of D- and L-methyl-3-hydroxybutyric acid.

Authors:  G R Herzberg; M Rogerson
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.365

9.  Microbial diversity in an in situ reactor system treating monochlorobenzene contaminated groundwater as revealed by 16S ribosomal DNA analysis.

Authors:  Albin Alfreider; Carsten Vogt; Wolfgang Babel
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.022

10.  Rapid evolution of redox processes in a petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer.

Authors:  Francis H Chapelle; Paul M Bradley; Derek R Lovley; Kathleen O'Neill; James E Landmeyer
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.671

View more
  13 in total

1.  Stability and performance of Xanthobacter autotrophicus GJ10 during 1,2-dichloroethane biodegradation.

Authors:  Ines I R Baptista; Ludmila G Peeva; Ning-Yi Zhou; David J Leak; Athanasios Mantalaris; Andrew G Livingston
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Impact of long-term diesel contamination on soil microbial community structure.

Authors:  Nora B Sutton; Farai Maphosa; Jose A Morillo; Waleed Abu Al-Soud; Alette A M Langenhoff; Tim Grotenhuis; Huub H M Rijnaarts; Hauke Smidt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Microbial diversity, community composition and metabolic potential in hydrocarbon contaminated oily sludge: prospects for in situ bioremediation.

Authors:  Ranjit Das; Sufia K Kazy
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Characterization of bacterial composition and diversity in a long-term petroleum contaminated soil and isolation of high-efficiency alkane-degrading strains using an improved medium.

Authors:  Jun Zheng; Jun-Qiao Feng; Lei Zhou; Serge Maurice Mbadinga; Ji-Dong Gu; Bo-Zhong Mu
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Salinity constraints on subsurface archaeal diversity and methanogenesis in sedimentary rock rich in organic matter.

Authors:  Patricia J Waldron; Steven T Petsch; Anna M Martini; Klaus Nüsslein; Klaus Nüslein
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Evaluations of different hypervariable regions of archaeal 16S rRNA genes in profiling of methanogens by Archaea-specific PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  Zhongtang Yu; Rubén García-González; Floyd L Schanbacher; Mark Morrison
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Oligonucleotide primers, probes and molecular methods for the environmental monitoring of methanogenic archaea.

Authors:  Takashi Narihiro; Yuji Sekiguchi
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 5.813

8.  Methane production from protozoan endosymbionts following stimulation of microbial metabolism within subsurface sediments.

Authors:  Dawn E Holmes; Ludovic Giloteaux; Roberto Orellana; Kenneth H Williams; Mark J Robbins; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Is the methanogenic community reflecting the methane emissions of river sediments?-comparison of two study sites.

Authors:  Prem Prashant Chaudhary; Martin Rulík; Martin Blaser
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Microbial and Isotopic Evidence for Methane Cycling in Hydrocarbon-Containing Groundwater from the Pennsylvania Region.

Authors:  Adrien Vigneron; Andrew Bishop; Eric B Alsop; Kellie Hull; Ileana Rhodes; Robert Hendricks; Ian M Head; Nicolas Tsesmetzis
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.