Literature DB >> 1564012

Application of ultrasound for feeding and finishing animals: a review.

P L Houghton1, L M Turlington.   

Abstract

The ability to evaluate carcass traits in live animals is of value to research, educational, and industry personnel. Ultrasonic technology has been tested since the early 1950s and continues to be under investigation as a means of accomplishing this task. The accuracy of ultrasound in predicting carcass traits is variable and is dependent on species, ultrasonic instrumentation, and(or) the skill of the technician. Based on this review, the ranges of correlation coefficients (r) for carcass traits as predicted by ultrasound to the respective carcass measurement are as follows: swine (fat .20 to .94; longissimus muscle .27 to .93), sheep (fat .42 to .95; longissimus muscle .36 to .79) and beef (fat .45 to .96; longissimus muscle .20 to .94; marbling .20 to .91). Although these correlation coefficients give an indication of the accuracy of ultrasound, it should be noted that these statistics do not reflect population variation or bias. Applications of ultrasound in swine finishing programs include the successful prediction of market weight carcass characteristics and the prediction of percentage of lean cuts before slaughter. In contrast, the application of ultrasound in lamb finishing programs has met with limited success. Most data indicate that weight and(or) visual estimations of fat are at least as accurate as ultrasound predictions of carcass composition. In beef finishing programs, ultrasound has, at times, been used successfully to predict fat and muscle traits before slaughter and beef carcass chemical composition. The ability to predict marbling, however, remains unclear and requires further investigation. Ultrasound has also been used in beef finishing programs to predict days on feed to a constant body compositional end point. When summarized, these data indicate that a single ultrasonic measurement of fat can be helpful in predicting days on feed in yearling cattle. When used alone, however, a single backfat measurement does not provide adequate accuracy. Therefore, factors such as age, sex, breed type, weight, and hip height are needed to help predict days on feed more accurately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1564012     DOI: 10.2527/1992.703930x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of a genomic-enhanced sorting system for feeder cattle1.

Authors:  Everestus C Akanno; Chinyere Ekine-Dzivenu; Liuhong Chen; Michael Vinsky; Mohammed K Abo-Ismail; Michael D MacNeil; Graham Plastow; John Basarab; Changxi Li; Carolyn Fitzsimmons
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The history of adipocyte and adipose tissue research in meat animals.

Authors:  Gary J Hausman; Werner G Bergen; Terry D Etherton; Steve B Smith
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Real-time Ultrasound Measurements for Hanwoo Cows at Different Ages and Pregnancy Status.

Authors:  J H Lee; Y M Lee; S-H Oh; H J Son; D J Jeong; Niki Whitley; J J Kim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Slaughter Characteristics of Feedlot-Finished Premium South African Lamb: Effects of Sex and Breed Type.

Authors:  Daniël André Van der Merwe; Tertius Swanepoel Brand; Louwrens Christiaan Hoffman
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-05-18

5.  Growth Performance, Carcass and Meat Traits of Autochthonous Arouquesa Weaners Raised on Traditional and Improved Feeding Systems.

Authors:  Laura Sacarrão-Birrento; Maria José Gomes; Severiano R Silva; José A Silva; Duarte Moreira; Raquel Vieira; Luis Mendes Ferreira; Pedro Pereira; André M de Almeida; José Carlos Almeida; Carlos Venâncio
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.231

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.