Literature DB >> 15639682

Eating disorders guidelines from NICE.

G Terence Wilson1, Roz Shafran.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: January, 2004, marked the publication of NICE guidelines for the treatment of eating disorders, a series of recommendations from a multidisciplinary, comprehensive, and rigorous process. The recommendations are assigned a grade from A (strong empirical support from well-conducted randomised trials) to C (expert opinion without strong empirical data). Over 100 recommendations were made, most of which were given a C grade. No specific recommendations were made for anorexia nervosa. Cognitive behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa was assigned grade A because of the evidence showing that it is superior to other psychological and drug treatments. Antidepressants for bulimia nervosa were given grade B. No specific recommendations were made for atypical eating disorders except for binge-eating disorder (cognitive behavioural therapy was recommended [A]). STARTING POINT: The methodological rigour of the NICE guidelines is in contrast with the current Practice Guideline for Eating Disorders (PGED) of the American Psychiatric Association. PGED does not detail criteria for evaluating supporting research. Instead of making clear recommendations, PGED is uncritically inclusive and emphasises subjective judgment of individual clinicians. The NICE guidelines balance recommending specific treatments against the importance of clinical judgment when guideline recommendations are not readily applicable. WHERE NEXT: Evidence-based guidelines are limited by the quality of the available research and its clinical relevance. The NICE guidelines underscore the absence of sufficient evidence for guidance in several important areas, such as atypical eating disorders (eating disorders not otherwise specified) which are the most common. Research on the treatment of these atypical eating disorders is needed. Evidence-based psychological treatments are not routinely implemented in general practice. Dissemination of these demonstrably effective treatments poses a challenge, and learning how to implement evidence-based psychological treatments and monitor their use is a research priority.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15639682     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17669-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  32 in total

1.  Managing preexisting diabetes for pregnancy: summary of evidence and consensus recommendations for care.

Authors:  John L Kitzmiller; Jennifer M Block; Florence M Brown; Patrick M Catalano; Deborah L Conway; Donald R Coustan; Erica P Gunderson; William H Herman; Lisa D Hoffman; Maribeth Inturrisi; Lois B Jovanovic; Siri I Kjos; Robert H Knopp; Martin N Montoro; Edward S Ogata; Pathmaja Paramsothy; Diane M Reader; Barak M Rosenn; Alyce M Thomas; M Sue Kirkman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Day hospital programmes for eating disorders: a review of the similarities, differences and goals.

Authors:  G Abbate-Daga; C Gramaglia; S Preda; E Comba; A Brustolin; S Fassino
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2009 Jun-Sep       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  Are diagnostic criteria for eating disorders markers of medical severity?

Authors:  Rebecka Peebles; Kristina K Hardy; Jenny L Wilson; James D Lock
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Cognitive-behavioral therapy for weight management and eating disorders in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Denise E Wilfley; Rachel P Kolko; Andrea E Kass
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am       Date:  2011-04

5.  Cognitive-behavioral or psychodynamic therapy for people with bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  Antonios Dakanalis; Giuseppe Riva; Santino Gaudio; Massimo Clerici
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 6.  Psychological treatments for binge eating disorder.

Authors:  Juliette M Iacovino; Dana M Gredysa; Myra Altman; Denise E Wilfley
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 7.  Anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Manuel Föcker; Susanne Knoll; Johannes Hebebrand
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.785

8.  Responsiveness of the Eating Disorders Quality of Life Scale (EDQLS) in a longitudinal multi-site sample.

Authors:  Carol E Adair; Gisele C Marcoux; Theanna F Bischoff; Brian S Cram; Carol J Ewashen; Jorge Pinzon; Joanne L Gusella; Josie Geller; Yvette Scattolon; Patricia Fergusson; Lisa Styles; Krista E Brown
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Stepped care and cognitive-behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa: randomised trial.

Authors:  James E Mitchell; Stewart Agras; Scott Crow; Katherine Halmi; Christopher G Fairburn; Susan Bryson; Helena Kraemer
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 10.  Cognitive-behavioural therapy for individuals with bulimia nervosa and a co-occurring substance use disorder.

Authors:  Robyn Sysko; Tom Hildebrandt
Journal:  Eur Eat Disord Rev       Date:  2009-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.