Literature DB >> 15639677

Repeat sudden unexpected and unexplained infant deaths: natural or unnatural?

R G Carpenter1, A Waite, R C Coombs, C Daman-Willems, A McKenzie, J Huber, J L Emery.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been suggestions that when two or three unexpected unexplained infant deaths occur within a family they are more likely to be unnatural than natural. We aimed to estimate the probability that a second infant death is natural versus unnatural.
METHODS: The Care of Next Infant programme (CONI) supports parents who have previously had an unexpected and apparently unexplained infant death and is currently available in over 90% of health districts in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. We studied all deaths in 6373 infants who had completed the CONI programme by December, 1999. After a CONI death, we made detailed enquiries into the previous death and the CONI death, including a family interview, a review of autopsies, and case discussion.
FINDINGS: 57 (8.9 per 1000) CONI infants died. Nine deaths were inevitable, and 48 were unexpected. 44 families lost one child, and two families lost two children. Of the 46 first CONI deaths, 40 were natural; the other six were probable homicides, five committed by one or both parents (two criminally convicted). The ratio of 40 natural to six unnatural deaths is 6.7 (95% CI 2.8-19.4). Enquiries identified 18 families with two SIDS(sudden infant death syndrome) deaths and two families with probable covert double homicides (ratio 9.0 [2.2 to 80.0]). There were no convictions in 13 incomplete cases. Families with three deaths are reported.
INTERPRETATION: Repeat unexpected infant deaths are most probably natural.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15639677     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17662-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  11 in total

Review 1.  Was message of sudden infant death study misleading?

Authors:  Jonathan Gornall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-12-02

2.  Special report adds nothing new, say paper authors.

Authors:  R G Carpenter; A Waite; R C Coombs; C Daman-Willems; A McKenzie; J Huber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-01-06

Review 3.  Sudden infant death syndrome.

Authors:  Carl E Hunt; Fern R Hauck
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  The relation between child death and child maltreatment.

Authors:  C Jenny; R Isaac
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 5.  Role of congenital long-QT syndrome in unexplained sudden infant death: proposal for an electrocardiographic screening in relatives.

Authors:  Alban-Elouen Baruteau; Julien Baruteau; Ryad Joomye; Raphael Martins; Frédéric Treguer; Remi Baruteau; Jean-Claude Daubert; Philippe Mabo; Michel Roussey
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Uncertainty in classification of repeat sudden unexpected infant deaths in Care of the Next Infant programme.

Authors:  C J Bacon; West Yorkshire Braithwaite; E N Hey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-07-21

7.  Identifying influential observations in Bayesian models by using Markov chain Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Ian R White; James Carpenter
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Wrongful diagnosis of child abuse--a master theory.

Authors:  James Le Fanu
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 18.000

Review 9.  The future of child protection.

Authors:  D M B Hall
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 18.000

Review 10.  Sudden infant death syndrome and inherited cardiac conditions.

Authors:  Alban-Elouen Baruteau; David J Tester; Jamie D Kapplinger; Michael J Ackerman; Elijah R Behr
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.