BACKGROUND: Glass fronted gas fires have become a popular addition to many homes as a source of heat energy. The flames, however, provide curiosity for young children attracting them towards the hot glass plate resulting in contact burns. Our study aimed to ascertain the features and pattern of morbidity of such injuries, and to address preventive measures. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of children with contact burns who were treated in our unit over an eight-year period. The cases were identified from the burns database, and their case-notes and follow-up records reviewed. RESULTS: Thirty-five children (M: 20; F: 15; Age range: 6 months to 10 years) were identified. The total body surface area of the burn was between <1 and 5%. Hand or fingers were the commonest sites involved. The depth was variable with 21 children sustaining superficial and seven deep dermal burns. All but one child were treated conservatively. Follow-up visits ranged from one to 24 (median: five); follow-up period was from 2 days to 1 year (median: 17 days). CONCLUSION: Although glass plate contact burns may be minor and superficial, they nevertheless affect a vital anatomical area. They also result in psychological distress for the child, and stress and time off work for parents. Awareness and measures to prevent such injuries should therefore be addressed by the responsible authorities.
BACKGROUND: Glass fronted gas fires have become a popular addition to many homes as a source of heat energy. The flames, however, provide curiosity for young children attracting them towards the hot glass plate resulting in contact burns. Our study aimed to ascertain the features and pattern of morbidity of such injuries, and to address preventive measures. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of children with contact burns who were treated in our unit over an eight-year period. The cases were identified from the burns database, and their case-notes and follow-up records reviewed. RESULTS: Thirty-five children (M: 20; F: 15; Age range: 6 months to 10 years) were identified. The total body surface area of the burn was between <1 and 5%. Hand or fingers were the commonest sites involved. The depth was variable with 21 children sustaining superficial and seven deep dermal burns. All but one child were treated conservatively. Follow-up visits ranged from one to 24 (median: five); follow-up period was from 2 days to 1 year (median: 17 days). CONCLUSION: Although glass plate contact burns may be minor and superficial, they nevertheless affect a vital anatomical area. They also result in psychological distress for the child, and stress and time off work for parents. Awareness and measures to prevent such injuries should therefore be addressed by the responsible authorities.