Literature DB >> 15639170

Structural encoding and recognition of biological motion: evidence from event-related potentials and source analysis.

Daniel Jokisch1, Irene Daum, Boris Suchan, Nikolaus F Troje.   

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated how different processing stages involved in the perceptual analysis of biological motion (BM) are reflected by modulations in event-related potentials (ERP) in order to elucidate the time course and location of neural processing of BM. Data analysis was carried out using conventional averaging techniques as well as source localization with low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). ERPs were recorded in response to point-light displays of a walking person, an inverted walking person and displays of scrambled motion. Analysis yielded a pronounced negativity with a peak at 180 ms after stimulus onset which was more pronounced for upright walkers than for inverted walkers and scrambled motion. A later negative component between 230 and 360 ms after stimulus onset had a larger amplitude for upright and inverted walkers as compared to scrambled walkers. In the later component, negativity was more pronounced in the right hemisphere revealing asymmetries in BM perception. LORETA analysis yielded evidence for sources specific to BM within the right fusiform gyrus and the right superior temporal gyrus for the second component, whereas sources for BM in the early component were located in areas associated with attentional aspects of visual processing. The early component might reflect the pop-out effect of a moving dot pattern representing the highly familiar form of a human figure, whereas the later component might be associated with the specific analysis of motion patterns providing biologically relevant information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15639170     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  29 in total

Review 1.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Movement-related neuromagnetic fields in preschool age children.

Authors:  Douglas Cheyne; Cecilia Jobst; Graciela Tesan; Stephen Crain; Blake Johnson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  TMS over the superior temporal sulcus affects expressivity evaluation of portraits.

Authors:  Chiara Ferrari; Susanna Schiavi; Zaira Cattaneo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Visual event-related potentials to biological motion stimuli in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Anne Kröger; Anke Bletsch; Christoph Krick; Michael Siniatchkin; Tomasz A Jarczok; Christine M Freitag; Stephan Bender
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  The implications of social neuroscience for social disability.

Authors:  James C McPartland; Kevin A Pelphrey
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-06

Review 6.  Recent advances in understanding the neural bases of autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  James C McPartland; Marika Coffman; Kevin A Pelphrey
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 7.  Cerebellar Contribution to Emotional Body Language Perception.

Authors:  Chiara Ferrari; Andrea Ciricugno; Zaira Cattaneo
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  The role of spatial and temporal information in biological motion perception.

Authors:  Joachim Lange; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

9.  Human infants dissociate structural and dynamic information in biological motion: evidence from neural systems.

Authors:  Vincent M Reid; Stefanie Hoehl; Jennifer Landt; Tricia Striano
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Neural correlates of apparent motion perception of impoverished facial stimuli: a comparison of ERP and ERSP activity.

Authors:  Alejandra Rossi; Francisco J Parada; Artemy Kolchinsky; Aina Puce
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.