Literature DB >> 15638911

Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children.

Morshed A Salah1, Béla Tállai, Endre Holman, Munim A Khan, György Tóth, Csaba Tóth.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In the paediatric section, two papers relating to the upper urinary tract are presented. The first, from Hungary, describes simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 13 patients, where it was deemed feasible; this is the first such report. Authors from London report on unilateral nephrectomy in patients with nephrogenic hypertension, and found that it was successful in normalising blood pressure in patients with renal hypertension with a normal contralateral kidney.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of removing bilateral kidney stones simultaneously from children, in one session. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients (three girls and 10 boys, 26 kidneys; mean age 8 years, range 3-14) underwent simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the same session, under general anaesthesia, starting with ureteric catheter insertion into both kidneys and using a 26 F adult nephroscope. The mean (range) stone diameter was 2 (1-3.5) cm. Three patients had staghorn stones in one of their kidneys. Ultrasonic disintegration was used; two patients had bilateral and two others unilateral endopylotomy, and one patient had percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy in the same session. The mean (range) operative duration was 65 (55-90) min.
RESULTS: All patients were rendered stone-free; there was no severe bleeding or any other complication. On one side in one of the patients, a second session was needed because of residual stone. The nephrostomy tubes were removed 3 and 4 days after PCNL and the hospital stay was 6 (1-11) days.
CONCLUSION: The advantages of simultaneous bilateral PCNL are reduced psychological stress, one cystoscopy and anaesthesia, less medication and a shorter hospital stay and convalescence, with considerable savings in cost. In experienced hands this method can be used not only in adults but also in children. To our knowledge this is the only report of this technique in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15638911     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05265.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current role of PCNL in pediatric urolithiasis.

Authors:  Ravindra B Sabnis; Jaspreet S Chhabra; Arvind P Ganpule; Sachin Abrol; Mahesh R Desai
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Minimally invasive surgical approaches to kidney stones in children.

Authors:  Hasan Serkan Dogan; Serdar Tekgul
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Management of multiple stones in a single session using minimally invasive methods in infants with renal failure: renal salvage.

Authors:  Ahmet Ozturk; Selcuk Guven; Mesut Piskin; Mehmet Kilinc; Jale Celik; Mehmet Arslan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Management of pediatric stone disease.

Authors:  H Serkan Dogan; Serdar Tekgul
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Shockwave lithotripsy and endourological stone treatment in children.

Authors:  Sven Lahme
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-01-31

6.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: does age matter?

Authors:  Hasan Serkan Dogan; Hakan Kilicarslan; Yakup Kordan; Sinan Celen; Bulent Oktay
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Pediatric urolithiasis: the current surgical management.

Authors:  Michael Straub; Jürgen Gschwend; Christoph Zorn
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 8.  Status quo of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children.

Authors:  Sotirios Bogris; Athanasios G Papatsoris
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.