Literature DB >> 15637566

T cell-mediated reactions to iodinated contrast media: evaluation by skin and lymphocyte activation tests.

Gisèle Kanny1, Werner Pichler, Martine Morisset, Patricia Franck, Béatrice Marie, Chantal Kohler, Jean-Marie Renaudin, Etienne Beaudouin, Jean Sainte Laudy, D Anne Moneret-Vautrin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In addition to immediate reactions, late adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) were reported in 2% to 5% of patients exposed to ICM and, as a consequence, have recently gained more attention. A few well-documented case reports postulate a hypersensitivity mechanism.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to demonstrate a T cell-mediated mechanism to the ICM by using in vitro and ex vivo tests.
METHODS: We analyzed 12 patients with 13 adverse ICM reactions, 9 of whom were women. Clinical history suggested an immune reaction to ICM. Skin tests (skin prick, intradermal, and patch tests) were performed with various ICM and read after 15 minutes and 24 and 48 hours. Skin biopsy specimens of positive test sites of 11 patients were evaluated by means of immunohistology. T-cell reactivity to ICM in vitro was analyzed with lymphocyte activation tests.
RESULTS: Seven patients showed generalized maculopapular eruptions, one of them with fever; 4 had a so-called drug hypersensitivity syndrome with exanthema, eosinophilia, and fever; 1 had maculopapular eruptions and fever; 1 had late-onset urticaria with loss of consciousness; and 1 had facial edema and respiratory distress. An immune reaction to ICM was inferred from positive skin prick test (2 patients), positive patch test (10 patients), and positive intradermal test (9 patients) at 24 and 48 hours. Skin biopsy specimens revealed a T-cell infiltrate in the dermis with predominantly CD4 + T cells in 8 patients, CD8 + T cells in 1 patient, and equal numbers in 1 patient. Cross-sensitivities to several ICM were observed (9/12). Other drug allergies were noted in 6 of the 12 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Delayed reactions to ICM are most likely caused by immune reactions to these drugs and can elicit different clinical features. The involvement of T cells is suggested by positive skin test, as well as positive proliferative responses, to the drugs in vitro . A high degree of cross-reactivity with other than the eliciting ICM was observed. Moreover, 50% of these patients reported another drug hypersensitivity, suggesting a predisposition to immune reactivity in some patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15637566     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  23 in total

Review 1.  [Complications due to contrast agent administration: what has been confirmed in prevention?].

Authors:  E Schönenberger; M Mühler; M Dewey
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  A practical guide to diagnose lesser-known immediate and delayed contrast media-induced adverse cutaneous reactions.

Authors:  Ingrid Böhm; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Fixed drug eruption induced by an iodinated non-ionic X-ray contrast medium: a practical approach to identify the causative agent and to prevent its recurrence.

Authors:  Ingrid Böhm; Jesus Medina; Pilar Prieto; Wolfgang Block; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Shock following administration of contrast medium in a patient with Kawasaki disease.

Authors:  Toru Watanabe
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-02-17

5.  Late adverse reactions to intravascular iodine based contrast media: an update.

Authors:  Marie-France Bellin; Fulvio Stacul; Judith A W Webb; Henrik S Thomsen; Sameh K Morcos; Torsten Almén; Peter Aspelin; Olivier Clement; Gertraud Heinz-Peer; Peter Reimer; Aart van der Molen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Recent advances in the understanding of severe cutaneous adverse reactions.

Authors:  N R Adler; A K Aung; E N Ergen; J Trubiano; M S Y Goh; E J Phillips
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 9.302

7.  Monitoring non-immediate allergic reactions to iodine contrast media.

Authors:  M J Torres; C Mayorga; J A Cornejo-Garcia; S Lopez; P Chaves; C Rondon; T Fernandez; M Blanca
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Evidence for immunological (allergic) mechanisms in a subgroup of patients with phenprocoumon-induced liver disease.

Authors:  Reinhild Klein
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Should patients with risk factors be tested for hypersensitivity to contrast media: a prospective study.

Authors:  Fatma Merve Tepetam; Nezihe Çiftaslan; Özlem Oruç; Dildar Duman; Meltem Ağca; İsmet Bulut; Bahattin Çolakoğlu
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Nausea and vomiting after exposure to non-ionic contrast media: incidence and risk factors focusing on preparatory fasting.

Authors:  Yeon Soo Kim; Soon Ho Yoon; Young Hun Choi; Chang Min Park; Whal Lee; Jin Mo Goo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.