Michael J Duffy1. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Michael.Duffy@ucd.ie
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unpredictable efficacy and toxicity are hallmarks of most anticancer therapies. Predictive markers are factors that are associated with response or resistance to a particular therapy. METHODS: The English literature relating to predictive markers in oncology was reviewed. Particular attention was paid to metaanalyses, systematic reviews, prospective trials, and guidelines issued by expert panels. RESULTS: The prototype predictive tests in oncology are the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), which are used to select patients with breast cancer likely to respond to hormone therapy. A more recently introduced predictive marker is HER-2 for selecting patients with advanced breast cancer for treatment with the therapeutic antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin). In adjuvant breast cancer, overproduction of HER-2 may also indicate an enhanced sensitivity to high-dose anthracycline-based regimens. On the other hand, in both early and advanced breast cancer, high concentrations of HER-2 appear to correlate with a lower probability of response to hormone therapy. Although many different anticancer drugs appear to mediate tumor regression by inducing apoptosis, there is currently no consistent evidence that any of the molecules implicated in this process can be used as predictive markers. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, the only recommended predictive markers in oncology are ER and PR for selecting endocrine-sensitive breast cancers and HER-2 for identifying breast cancer patients with metastatic disease who may benefit from trastuzumab. For malignancies other than breast cancers, validated predictive markers do not exist at present.
BACKGROUND: Unpredictable efficacy and toxicity are hallmarks of most anticancer therapies. Predictive markers are factors that are associated with response or resistance to a particular therapy. METHODS: The English literature relating to predictive markers in oncology was reviewed. Particular attention was paid to metaanalyses, systematic reviews, prospective trials, and guidelines issued by expert panels. RESULTS: The prototype predictive tests in oncology are the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), which are used to select patients with breast cancer likely to respond to hormone therapy. A more recently introduced predictive marker is HER-2 for selecting patients with advanced breast cancer for treatment with the therapeutic antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin). In adjuvant breast cancer, overproduction of HER-2 may also indicate an enhanced sensitivity to high-dose anthracycline-based regimens. On the other hand, in both early and advanced breast cancer, high concentrations of HER-2 appear to correlate with a lower probability of response to hormone therapy. Although many different anticancer drugs appear to mediate tumor regression by inducing apoptosis, there is currently no consistent evidence that any of the molecules implicated in this process can be used as predictive markers. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, the only recommended predictive markers in oncology are ER and PR for selecting endocrine-sensitive breast cancers and HER-2 for identifying breast cancerpatients with metastatic disease who may benefit from trastuzumab. For malignancies other than breast cancers, validated predictive markers do not exist at present.
Authors: Puay Hoon Tan; Liang Cheng; Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq; Maria J Merino; George Netto; Victor E Reuter; Steven S Shen; David J Grignon; Rodolfo Montironi; Lars Egevad; John R Srigley; Brett Delahunt; Holger Moch Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Michael Mullerad; David P Eisenberg; Timothy J Akhurst; Prasad S Adusumilli; Christopher C Riedl; Amit Bhargava; Mithat Gonen; Ronald Finn; Peter T Scardino; Yuman Fong Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Sun Seong Lee; Sang Kyun Bae; Yun Soo Park; Ji Sun Park; Tae Hyun Kim; Hye Kyoung Yoon; Hyo Jung Ahn; Seok Mo Lee Journal: Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-08-15
Authors: Jie Chen; Ana R Gomes; Lara J Monteiro; San Yu Wong; Lai Han Wu; Ting-Ting Ng; Christina T Karadedou; Julie Millour; Ying-Chi Ip; Yuen Nei Cheung; Andrew Sunters; Kelvin Y K Chan; Eric W-F Lam; Ui-Soon Khoo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-08-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Zongren Zhang; Jinda Fan; Philip P Cheney; Mikhail Y Berezin; W Barry Edwards; Walter J Akers; Duanwen Shen; Kexian Liang; Joseph P Culver; Samuel Achilefu Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Carmen Aceves; Pablo García-Solís; Omar Arroyo-Helguera; Laura Vega-Riveroll; Guadalupe Delgado; Brenda Anguiano Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2009-06-06 Impact factor: 27.401