Literature DB >> 15636940

Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section following epidural analgesia in labour: a relative contraindication.

A Gupta1, G Enlund, M Bengtsson, F Sjöberg.   

Abstract

Three cases are described in which epidural analgesia was performed during labour using an infusion of bupivacaine 0.125-0.25%. When, in all 3 cases, caesarean section was required for failure to progress, hyperbaric bupivacaine was given in doses of 10 mg, 12.5 mg and 15 mg respectively. Within 2-4 min all 3 patients had a high block, complained of difficulty in breathing and subsequently developed apnoea. The trachea was intubated after administration of thiopentone and succinylcholine and the operation continued. Cardiovascular support was provided by the administration of ephedrine injected intermittently intravenously. The spinal block receded and the patients were able to return to the ward without any further complications. All three mothers remain in good health and do not regret having had spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. In contrast to previously reported cases of high spinal anaesthesia following unsuccessful epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section, this report describes 3 cases of high spinal following the administration of spinal anaesthesia upon an ongoing epidural infusion of local anaesthetic during labour. As no guidelines are available as to the recommended dose of spinal anaesthetic under such circumstances and, in view of the several case reports describing a similar complication under different circumstances, we suggest that spinal anaesthesia is contraindicated upon ongoing epidural analgesia or following a failed epidural.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 15636940     DOI: 10.1016/0959-289x(94)90229-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth        ISSN: 0959-289X            Impact factor:   2.603


  4 in total

1.  Total spinal block after spinal anesthesia following ongoing epidural analgesia for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Sahar M Siddik-Sayyid; Pamela H Gellad; Marie T Aouad
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Suspected total spinal in patient having emergent Caesarean section, a case report and literature review.

Authors:  H Virgin; E Oddby; J G Jakobsson
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-10-03

Review 3.  Anaesthetic management of obstetric emergencies.

Authors:  Pradeep A Dongare; Madagondapalli S Nataraj
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-09

4.  Evaluation of failed and high blocks associated with spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery following inadequate labour epidural: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lisa M Einhorn; Ashraf S Habib
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 6.713

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.