Literature DB >> 15636556

Historical review of cervical arthroplasty.

Hoang Le1, Issada Thongtrangan, Daniel H Kim.   

Abstract

Early attempts at spinal arthroplasty in the 1950s yielded limited success. A revival of this procedure occurred in the 1980s and became a realistic treatment option in the 1990s. Both lumbar and cervical arthroplasties have been introduced in the US since 2000 for randomized, prospective studies in accordance with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigational device exemption provisions. In June 2004 the first lumbar arthroplasty device was approved by the FDA for use in the US. It is likely that cervical arthroplasty will soon follow and may be available for widespread use as early as 2006. In this paper the authors review the historical development of cervical arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15636556     DOI: 10.3171/foc.2004.17.3.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  14 in total

Review 1.  Cervical and lumbar spinal arthroplasty: clinical review.

Authors:  T D Uschold; D Fusco; R Germain; L M Tumialan; S W Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Clinical and radiological evaluation of cervical disc arthroplasty with 5-year follow-up: a prospective study of 384 patients.

Authors:  T Dufour; J Beaurain; J Huppert; P Dam-Hieu; P Bernard; J P Steib
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Primary and coupled motions after cervical total disc replacement using a compressible six-degree-of-freedom prosthesis.

Authors:  A G Patwardhan; M N Tzermiadianos; P P Tsitsopoulos; L I Voronov; S M Renner; M L Reo; G Carandang; K Ritter-Lang; R M Havey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Current Concepts of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

Authors:  David Turkov; Alan Job; Cesar Iturriaga; Rohit B Verma
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

5.  Early results and review of the literature of a novel hybrid surgical technique combining cervical arthrodesis and disc arthroplasty for treating multilevel degenerative disc disease: opposite or complementary techniques?

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Roberto Assietti; Leonardo Corbino; Giuseppe Olindo; Pietro V Foti; Vittorio Russo; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Long term preservation of motion with artificial cervical disc implants: A comparison between cervical disc replacement and rigid fusion with cage.

Authors:  Rafael Cincu; Francisco de Asis Lorente; Joaquin Gomez; Jose Eiras; Amit Agrawal
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

7.  Prognostic factors related to motion dynamics following cervical arthroplasty with a bryan disc: average 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Han-Yong Heo; Sung-Jae Lee; Kwon-Yong Lee; Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-06-01

8.  Activ C cervical disc replacement for myelopathy.

Authors:  L McGonagle; S Cadman; S D Chitgopkar; L Canavan; M O'Malley; I M Shackleford
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2011-07

9.  A case of cervical metastases in a patient with preexisting cervical disc replacement and fusion after 2-year symptom-free interval: when do we need interdisciplinary diagnostics?

Authors:  Markus Melloh; Thomas Barz
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2012-08

Review 10.  The new Zero-P implant can effectively reduce the risk of postoperative dysphagia and complications compared with the traditional anterior cage and plate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mengchen Yin; Junming Ma; Quan Huang; Ye Xia; Qixing Shen; Chenglong Zhao; Jun Tao; Ni Chen; Zhingxing Yu; Jie Ye; Wen Mo; Jianru Xiao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.