Literature DB >> 15635516

Maximum recommended doses of local anesthetics: a multifactorial concept.

Per H Rosenberg1, Bernadette Th Veering, William F Urmey.   

Abstract

The current recommendations regarding maximum doses of local anesthetics presented in textbooks, or by the responsible pharmaceutical companies, are not evidence based (ie, determined by randomized and controlled studies). Rather, decisions on recommending certain maximum local anesthetic doses have been made in part by extrapolations from animal experiments, clinical experiences from the use of various doses and measurement of blood concentrations, case reports of local anesthetic toxicity, and pharmacokinetic results. The common occurrence of central nervous system toxicity symptoms when large lidocaine doses were used in infiltration anesthesia led to the recommendation of just 200 mg as the maximum dose, which has remained unchanged for more than 50 years. In most cases, there is no scientific justification for presenting exact milligram doses or mg/kg doses as maximum dose recommendations. Instead, only clinically adequate and safe doses (ranges) that are block specific are justified, taking into consideration the site of local anesthetic injection and patient-related factors such as age, organ dysfunctions, and pregnancy, which may influence the effect and the pharmacokinetics of the local anesthetic. Epinephrine in concentrations of 2.5 to 5 microg/mL should be added to the local anesthetic solution when large doses are administered, providing there are no contraindications for the use of epinephrine. As a rule, conditions (eg, end-stage pregnancy, high age in epidural, or spinal block) or diseases (uremia) that may increase the rate of the initial uptake of the local anesthetic are indications to reduce the dose in comparison to one normally used for young, healthy, and nonpregnant adults. On the other hand, the reduced clearance of local anesthetics associated with renal, hepatic, and cardiac diseases is the most important reason to reduce the dose for repeated or continuous administration. The magnitude of the reduction should be related to the expected influence of the pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15635516     DOI: 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  81 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block in a pediatric patient with acute hepatitis -A case report-.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Lee; Young-Rok Kim; Ho-Kyung Yu; Sung-Hwan Cho; Sang-Hyun Kim; Won Seok Chae
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-06-19

Review 2.  Peripheral nerve blocks on the upper extremity: Technique of landmark-based and ultrasound-guided approaches.

Authors:  T Steinfeldt; T Volk; P Kessler; O Vicent; H Wulf; A Gottschalk; M Lange; P Schwartzkopf; E Hüttemann; R Tessmann; A Marx; J Souquet; D Häger; W Nagel; J Biscoping; U Schwemmer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Continuous local analgesic therapy reduces pain after radical inguinal/iliacal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Heiko Neuss; Martin Schomaker; Wieland Raue; Gerold Koplin; Oliver Haase
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in a patient with Takayasu arteritis complicated by heart failure.

Authors:  Junichi Ogata; Takafumi Horishita; Munehiro Shiraishi; Kouichiro Minami
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Serum concentration of lidocaine after transversus abdominis plane block.

Authors:  Naoko Kato; Yoshihiro Fujiwara; Misako Harato; Shuji Kurokawa; Yasuyuki Shibata; Jun Harada; Toru Komatsu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 6.  Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph M Neal; J C Gerancher; James R Hebl; Brian M Ilfeld; Colin J L McCartney; Carlo D Franco; Quinn H Hogan
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

7.  Ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block or wound infiltration in children: a randomized blinded study of analgesia and bupivacaine absorption.

Authors:  Sean H Flack; Lizabeth D Martin; Benjamin J Walker; Adrian T Bosenberg; Laurilyn D Helmers; Adam B Goldin; Charles M Haberkern
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.556

Review 8.  Anaesthetic agents for advanced regional anaesthesia: a North American perspective.

Authors:  Chester C Buckenmaier; Lisa L Bleckner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Postoperative pain management in children and infants: an update.

Authors:  Christopher Brasher; Benjamin Gafsous; Sophie Dugue; Anne Thiollier; Joelle Kinderf; Yves Nivoche; Robert Grace; Souhayl Dahmani
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.022

10.  Anesthesia drugs in the obstetric and gynecologic practice.

Authors:  Roulhac D Toledano; Bhavani-Shankar Kodali; William R Camann
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.