Literature DB >> 15634715

Relationship between disease-related morbidity and biochemical markers of activity in patients with acromegaly.

Jardena J Puder1, Sujatha Nilavar, Kalmon D Post, Pamela U Freda.   

Abstract

The criteria for biochemical control of acromegaly that will best reduce disease-related morbidity in acromegaly are debated. We therefore studied the relationship of biochemical markers with an important metabolic parameter, insulin sensitivity, and clinical parameters reflecting disease activity in acromegaly. Newly diagnosed and postoperative patients with acromegaly underwent assessment of fasting IGF-I and fasting and postoral glucose tolerance test GH and insulin levels and completed a numeric signs and symptoms questionnaire. Insulin sensitivity was estimated by the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) and the composite insulin sensitivity index. Patients were divided into three groups: group I, normal IGF-I and nadir GH less than 0.14 mug/liter (n = 21); group II, normal IGF-I and nadir GH 0.14 mug/liter or more (n = 20); group III (active), elevated IGF-I (n = 25). Age, sex, and body mass index were comparable in these groups. Insulin sensitivity was reduced in group III (QUICKI: 0.33 +/- 0.01 and composite index: 3.44 +/- 0.54), compared with group II (0.38 +/- 0.01, P = 0.002 and 8.18 +/- 1.21, P = 0.0008), group I (0.38 +/- 0.01, P = 0.0008 and 8.91 +/- 1.34, P = 0.00001), and healthy controls (0.37 +/- 0.008, P = 0.009). When other nadir GH cut-offs were analyzed, insulin sensitivity remained relatively reduced in the elevated IGF-I group. IGF-I was a significant predictor for decreasing insulin sensitivity as calculated by QUICKI (r = 0.6, P < 0.0001) independently of nadir GH. Signs and symptom scores were higher in group III (mean 38.5 +/- 3.6%), compared with group II (mean 23.5 +/- 3.2%, P = 0.004) and group I (mean 20.5 +/- 3.7%, P = 0.0008) but not between the latter two groups. Our data indicate that overall and specifically in the presence of discordant serum IGF-I and nadir GH levels, IGF-I was more predictive than GH levels of insulin sensitivity and clinical symptom score in patients with acromegaly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15634715     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2004-2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  29 in total

Review 1.  Acromegaly as a cause of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-dependent hypercalcemia: case reports and review of the literature.

Authors:  Reshma Shah; Angelo Licata; Nelson M Oyesiku; Adriana G Ioachimescu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  IGF-1 levels across the spectrum of normal to elevated in acromegaly: relationship to insulin sensitivity, markers of cardiovascular risk and body composition.

Authors:  Tirissa J Reid; Zhezhen Jin; Wei Shen; Carlos M Reyes-Vidal; Jean Carlos Fernandez; Jeffrey N Bruce; Jane Kostadinov; Kalmon D Post; Pamela U Freda
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  Preoperative octreotide therapy and surgery in acromegaly: associations between glucose homeostasis and treatment response.

Authors:  R Helseth; S M Carlsen; J Bollerslev; J Svartberg; M Øksnes; S Skeie; S L Fougner
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  Current perspectives on the impact of clinical disease and biochemical control on comorbidities and quality of life in acromegaly.

Authors:  Federico Gatto; Claudia Campana; Francesco Cocchiara; Giuliana Corica; Manuela Albertelli; Mara Boschetti; Gianluigi Zona; Diego Criminelli; Massimo Giusti; Diego Ferone
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 6.514

5.  Lower visceral and subcutaneous but higher intermuscular adipose tissue depots in patients with growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I excess due to acromegaly.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda; Wei Shen; Steven B Heymsfield; Carlos M Reyes-Vidal; Eliza B Geer; Jeffrey N Bruce; Dympna Gallagher
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Prevalence and risk factors of impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus at diagnosis of acromegaly: a study in 148 patients.

Authors:  Orsalia Alexopoulou; Marie Bex; Peter Kamenicky; Augustine Bessomo Mvoula; Philippe Chanson; Dominique Maiter
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 7.  Medical consequences of acromegaly: what are the effects of biochemical control?

Authors:  Annamaria Colao; Renata S Auriemma; Rosario Pivonello; Mariano Galdiero; Gaetano Lombardi
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 8.  Monitoring of acromegaly: what should be performed when GH and IGF-1 levels are discrepant?

Authors:  Pamela U Freda
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 9.  Management of acromegaly in Latin America: expert panel recommendations.

Authors:  Ariel Barkan; Marcello D Bronstein; Oscar D Bruno; Alejandro Cob; Ana Laura Espinosa-de-los-Monteros; Monica R Gadelha; Gloria Garavito; Mirtha Guitelman; Ruth Mangupli; Moisés Mercado; Lesly Portocarrero; Michael Sheppard
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 10.  The endocrine tumor summit 2008: appraising therapeutic approaches for acromegaly and carcinoid syndrome.

Authors:  Anne Klibanski; Shlomo Melmed; David R Clemmons; Annamaria Colao; Regina S Cunningham; Mark E Molitch; Aaron I Vinik; Daphne T Adelman; Karen J P Liebert
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.