BACKGROUND: The Healthy Hawaii Initiative, funded through the Hawaii tobacco settlement, allocates funds from the Hawaii Department of Health to the Hawaii Department of Education for school programs that promote health and reduce the burden of chronic disease. This article outlines progress, challenges, and insights from the first 3 years of the Hawaii Partnership for Standards-based School Health Education (the Partnership). CONTEXT: The Hawaii Department of Education added health education as a content area to the Hawaii Content and Performance Standards in 1999. The American Cancer Society, Hawaii Pacific, Inc., convened a Comprehensive School Health Education Committee that initiated a school health professional development program for teachers. During the 2000-2001 academic year, new Healthy Hawaii Initiative funding began for school health programs. METHODS: Healthy Hawaii Initiative (HHI) funding has been used to provide new state and district resource teacher positions, professional development workshops for educators, tuition waivers and materials for graduate-level summer institutes for educators, annual statewide school health conferences, and pilot school implementation of coordinated school health programs. CONSEQUENCES: Schools across Hawaii demonstrate clear progress in implementing standards-based school health education and coordinated school health programs. The funding has led to increased support from other sources to build school health programs. INTERPRETATION: The ultimate beneficiaries of school health programs are the children and families of Hawaii. This health and education partnership continues to work toward improved health outcomes for young people as the future leaders and citizens of Hawaii.
BACKGROUND: The Healthy Hawaii Initiative, funded through the Hawaii tobacco settlement, allocates funds from the Hawaii Department of Health to the Hawaii Department of Education for school programs that promote health and reduce the burden of chronic disease. This article outlines progress, challenges, and insights from the first 3 years of the Hawaii Partnership for Standards-based School Health Education (the Partnership). CONTEXT: The Hawaii Department of Education added health education as a content area to the Hawaii Content and Performance Standards in 1999. The American Cancer Society, Hawaii Pacific, Inc., convened a Comprehensive School Health Education Committee that initiated a school health professional development program for teachers. During the 2000-2001 academic year, new Healthy Hawaii Initiative funding began for school health programs. METHODS: Healthy Hawaii Initiative (HHI) funding has been used to provide new state and district resource teacher positions, professional development workshops for educators, tuition waivers and materials for graduate-level summer institutes for educators, annual statewide school health conferences, and pilot school implementation of coordinated school health programs. CONSEQUENCES: Schools across Hawaii demonstrate clear progress in implementing standards-based school health education and coordinated school health programs. The funding has led to increased support from other sources to build school health programs. INTERPRETATION: The ultimate beneficiaries of school health programs are the children and families of Hawaii. This health and education partnership continues to work toward improved health outcomes for young people as the future leaders and citizens of Hawaii.
"Spend the money on what the fight was about!" In 2000,
Mississippi Attorney General Mike Moore urged attendees at the American
School Health Association National Conference to insist that their state
governments spend funds from the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) with
major tobacco companies on public health priorities (1). Despite a difficult
economy, the state of Hawaii has preserved a portion of its tobacco
settlement funds to create and support the Healthy Hawaii Initiative (HHI)
to promote health and reduce the burden of chronic disease.In 1999, the Hawaii legislature enacted legislation that distributed a
total of $14,444,758 in MSA funds in the following way:$5,055,665 (35%) was allocated toward the Hawaii Department of Health.
Of this amount, $3,665,665 was designated for health promotion and disease
prevention programs, including HHI. $1,400,000 was designated for the
Children's Health Insurance Program.$3,611,189 (25%) was allocated toward a Tobacco
Prevention and Control Trust Fund for tobacco education, prevention, and
cessation.$5,777,903 (40%) was allocated toward an Emergency Budget Reserve Fund (2).The DOH Health and Wellness Advisory Group, representing leading
community agencies and coalitions, and the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), collaborated to develop HHI. A major goal of HHI is to
promote the healthy development of youth relative to 3 critical risk
factors: poor nutrition, physical inactivity, and tobacco use. HHI efforts
include school-based programs, community programs, public and professional
education, and program evaluation.In 2000, DOH entered a 3-year agreement with the Hawaii Department of
Education (DOE) to provide HHI support for school health programs. This
article describes progress, challenges, and insights from the first 3 years
of the Partnership.
Context
Hawaii is a culturally diverse state, described as a rainbow of cultures
and ethnicities — though blended, each maintains its unique characteristics
and strengths. Hawaii's people live on 7 islands, each known for its
distinct geographical and cultural features. For example, the Big Island of
Hawaii has active volcanoes that draw visitors from all over the world. The
densely populated island of Oahu is known as "the gathering
place." Visitors must obtain permission to go to the tiny island of Niihau, inhabited primarily by Native Hawaiians. Hawaii recognizes English
and Hawaiian as official languages of the state.The state of Hawaii has one centralized DOE and one Board of Education.
The Hawaii DOE encompasses 280 public schools, 182,798 students, and 13,000
teachers. DOE operates 7 geographical school districts, but decision making
occurs at the state level. Hawaii's one statewide school system implements
new directives and initiatives, such as the revision of the Hawaii Content
and Performance Standards (HCPSII) in 1999 (3).Career and life skillsEducational technologyFine artsHealth educationEnglish language artsMathematicsPhysical educationScienceSocial studiesWorld languagesDOE added health education as a curriculum component — distinct from
physical education — as part of the 1999 HCPS revision (HCPS II).
Advocates used data from the CDC-funded Hawaii Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS)
of middle and high school students, and the Hawaii School Health Education
Profile (SHEP) of secondary school health programs, to support the
need for school health education. YRBS data provide information on the
status of adolescent health-risk behaviors in these 6 priority categories:
1) behaviors that contribute to unintentional and intentional injuries; 2)
tobacco use; 3) alcohol and other drug use; 4) sexual behaviors that
contribute to unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases; 5)
unhealthy dietary behaviors; and 6) physical inactivity. SHEP data provide
information on the status of school-based programs and policies designed to
address priority health-risk behaviors among youth. The SHEP questionnaires
are designed to be answered by principals and lead health education
teachers.Although Hawaii youth generally demonstrated lower levels of health-risk
behaviors than their counterparts across the United States — for example,
44.6% of Hawaii high school students used alcohol during the past month in 1999, compared to 50.0%
nationally — YRBS data showed that Hawaii's young people engage in
behaviors that put them at risk for serious health problems (4). Only 5.0% of lead health education teachers were
licensed in health education; 52.8% of lead health education teachers were
licensed in health and physical education (5).The prospect of implementing standards-based health education was
challenging for Hawaii's schools. The University of Hawaii at Manoa (UHM)
had discontinued its Bachelor of Education emphasis in health education for
secondary majors during a period of faculty and resource shortfalls.
Undergraduate students majoring in elementary education received no
preparation in health education. In 1999, school health education largely
was taught by a few licensed health educators who functioned with little
professional support and by teachers from other fields who were assigned
health education classes to fill their teaching schedules. The national
state-of-the-art in health education was far from the state-of-the-practice
in Hawaii.
Methods
With health education clearly designated as part of the Hawaii
curriculum, supporters at last had a viable vehicle for promoting school
health throughout the state. The American Cancer Society, Hawaii Pacific,
Inc. (ACS) convened the first meeting of a statewide Comprehensive School
Health Education (CSHE) committee in summer 1999. Participants included
representatives from ACS, DOE, DOH, College of Education (UHM), Hawaii Board
of Education, Hawaii Parent-Teacher-Student Association, Area Health
Education Center (AHEC), John A. Burns School of Medicine (UHM), DOE School
Food Service, and corporate sponsors Meadow Gold Dairy, Bank of Hawaii, and
the 3 Hawaii electric companies, HECO, HELCO, and MECO (6).In fall 1999, the Partnership began efforts to educate school and
community members about standards-based health education. This new approach
to health education focused on building personal and social skills in the
context of priority health-risk behaviors identified by the CDC (7). The 7
Hawaii Health Education Standards, based on the National Health Education
Standards, required schools to help students learn the following skills:
acquiring core health education concepts; accessing information, products,
and services; practicing self-management; analyzing influences;
demonstrating communication; modeling decision making and goal setting; and
advocating for health (8). The following 7 health-risk areas were designated
as context for learning and practicing health skills: 1) injury and violence
prevention; 2) alcohol and other drug use prevention; 3) sexual health and
responsibility; 4) tobacco use prevention; 5) nutrition and physical
activity; 6) mental and emotional health; and 7) personal and consumer
health.The ACS Cancer Control Director appealed to community partners to assist
DOE with the cost of district-level teacher workshops on Oahu and
neighboring islands. The resulting public-private collaboration continues
today. Meadow Gold Dairy and the Hawaii electric companies provided funding
for conference rooms and meals throughout the state. DOH, UHM, and ACS
provided additional fiscal, logistical, and professional support.The Partnership asked UHM to develop new graduate-level summer institute
courses in health education. COE faculty members pooled their expertise to
create courses in areas such as school violence prevention, healthy
sexuality education, and K-12 school health methods across health-risk
areas. The Partnership also made plans for a first statewide Health
Celebration Conference for teachers, counselors, and administrators during
fall 2000. The summer institutes and state conference were funded largely
through DOE grants from the CDC, the U.S. Department of Education, and
local corporate sponsorship. Meadow Gold Dairy launched a
corresponding statewide Got Health? campaign that featured the new
Hawaii Health Education Standards on the side panels of 300,000 milk
cartons.Teachers responded positively to the first year's professional
development opportunities, provided on Oahu, Maui, Kauai, and the Big Island
of Hawaii. For example, teachers provided this type of feedback: "Knowing
how to eliminate work that isn't standards-based, I think I will be more
comfortable with implementing activity-based curricula as well as teaching
to the standards with success" (9). To attend these initial workshops and
conference sessions, however, teachers had to ask their schools to pay for
substitute teachers. Because the health education standards were new, many
schools did not yet consider health education as a professional development
priority. Some schools were not willing or able to
allocate funds toward substitutes, and as a result, some teachers were unable
to attend the initial workshops and conference sessions.Despite those challenges, the 2000-2001 academic year brought exciting
news. With more focus placed on health education, DOH made the decision to
allocate HHI funds directly to DOE for implementing and promoting health
education programs at the school level.
Consequences
Through the HHI 3-year agreement and other federal financial support, DOE
and DOH have been able to provide funding for:Eleven new resource teacher positions at the state and district levels
to support implementation of the Hawaii Health Education and Hawaii
Physical Education Standards, which are part of HCPS II. Resource
teachers provide direct service to schools.Substitute teachers and curriculum materials for district workshops
held on Oahu and 3 neighbor islands. Travel funds are provided for
educators who live on neighbor islands. Approximately 500 teachers have
attended the spring workshops each year in 2001, 2002, and 2003.Tuition reductions, textbooks, and neighbor island travel for UHM
summer institute courses. Course offerings increased from 3 to 8 each
summer. Approximately 250 educators have attended the courses each year
in 2001, 2002, and 2003.Substitute teachers, curriculum materials, and neighbor island travel
for the statewide fall Health Celebration Conferences. HHI funding
allowed the Partnership to bring nationally recognized experts to work
with local educators. The fall 2003 conference was the fourth annual
Health Celebration Conference, with each conference averaging 500
participants.Six pilot schools to implement coordinated school health programs (CSHP)
using the CDC 8-component model. The 8 CSHP components include: 1) school
health services; 2) health education; 3) efforts to assure healthy
physical and social environments; 4) food services; 5) physical
education and other physical activities; 6) counseling, psychological,
and social services; 7) health programs for faculty and staff; and 8)
collaborative efforts among schools, families, and communities to
improve the health of students, faculty, and staff (10).Broad assessment measures of progress over time include the YRBS and SHEP.
Professional development for Hawaii educators in standards-based school
health education began in 1999. The Partnership will track the status of
youth risk behaviors over time as implementation of standards-based school
health education increases.The 2002 Hawaii SHEP data showed strong school progress in teaching to
meet the Hawaii Health Education Standards and providing healthy school
environments. Almost all secondary schools (97%) reported teaching a
required health education course with the state standards. More than three
fourths of lead health education teachers sought to increase student
knowledge of health-risk behaviors. More than 90% of teachers sought to
increase student standards-based health skills and used a range of
interactive teaching and learning strategies. Approximately 50% of teachers
received professional development about health-risk areas and teaching
skills for behavior change. More than 70% received professional development
in interactive teaching methods for health education. Most teachers
expressed interest in future professional development in health education
(11).Partnership efforts have resulted in the continued building of school
health education infrastructure. At the university level, COE developed a
new health education methods course, which is now required for all
elementary education majors. In addition, the HHI-funded summer institutes
led to the development of a Health Education Specialization in the Master of
Education program. To support these efforts, AHEC allocated 5 years of
funding to support a new tenure-line faculty position for school health in
COE.With increasing need for support in health education, DOH allocated
additional HHI funds to create a new DOE education specialist position to
oversee HHI school-based activities. Health education now holds equal
footing with the other 9 content areas in the Hawaii Content and Performance
Standards.Hawaii's school health education efforts received another boost with the
announcement of a 2003 Coordinated School Health Program Infrastructure
Cooperative Agreement between DOE and the CDC, with DOH serving as an essential
partner. This new funding will support continued CSHP efforts in the state,
with a focus on implementing CSHP throughout entire school complexes. This
funding adds to Hawaii's school health infrastructure by providing new
education specialist and state resource teacher positions for CSHP, as well
as school-level funding.The Partnership has produced several publications (6, 9, 11) and developed
a teaching guide: Healthy Keiki, Healthy Hawaii: Teaching with the Hawaii
Health Education Standards — A Handbook for K-12 Educators (12). More
than 2,000 copies of the handbook have been distributed to Hawaii educators.
Interpretation
Support for Hawaii's school health programs has grown through the
steadfast dedication and action of a group of committed partners in health
and education. They believe that school health programs can make a positive
difference in the lives of children, families, and communities. The rate of
progress and growth has been exciting. However, the institutionalization of
school health education is under constant threat from state budgetary
shortfalls and academic priorities mandated by federal legislation. In
particular, the tobacco settlement funds are the target of many special
interest groups during each legislative session. The federal education focus
on standardized testing often results in schools focusing their attention on
reading and mathematics and excluding other areas. The Partnership tackles
these issues by continuing to invest time and resources in teacher education
and professional development efforts. Another objective is to convince
administrators of the importance of skills-based health education. With 13,000 teachers in the state, professional development needs remain great.The importance of promoting the health of school-age youth receives
spoken support from decision makers. Hawaii's cultural values make child and
family health education a good fit with state priorities. However,
Partnership members recognize that DOE funding alone is inadequate to
support school health programs. Partners must continue to seek funding from
other community, state, federal, and private sources to keep programs
viable.Hawaii educators have welcomed the support they have received for
improving their health curricula and teaching skills. Educators routinely
ask when and where the next workshops, summer courses, and state conferences
will be held, and they report changing their teaching to reflect what they
learn through participation in the program. School and district
administrators have been more difficult to reach than teachers, primarily
because their positions encompass a vast scope of work. Demonstrating to
administrators how school health efforts can improve academic achievement is
a primary focus for the Partnership.Hawaii's experience may reflect more accurately how local school
districts operate, rather than how state education agencies operate. As
mentioned earlier, Hawaii has only 7 geographical school districts, and
decision making occurs at the state level. The 7 districts in Hawaii make up Hawaii's one statewide school system. Hundreds of independent
school districts may be located within a single state elsewhere in the
United States, and they may not be able to work so closely with their state
education agency. The Partnership has been diligent about publicizing
accomplishments across the state and the nation, in the belief that
decision makers tend to support efforts that enhance their own goals for the
health of children.Collaboration among the Partnership members overall has been smooth.
Supporters of child and adolescent health have stepped forward readily to be
involved in this work. Partners seem to have naturally found the things that
they do best (e.g., writing, organizing, teaching, contacting schools,
seeking funding), rather than competing to do the same things. The ACS CSHE
committee provides the "glue" that holds the Partnership together.
Perhaps Hawaii's most important lesson is simply to find, connect, and
coordinate the individuals and groups who share common goals for improving
the health of children and who are willing to work together to achieve them.
Within the Partnership, a small group of core individuals who represent K-12
education, health, and UHM meet monthly to coordinate efforts of the larger
membership.In the midst of pressures to improve math and reading test scores to meet
the demands of federal legislation, supporting school health programs can
refocus attention on guiding and nurturing children rather than teaching
subject matter alone. The Council of Chief State School Officers (13) and
the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (14) describe the
importance of supporting both health and education for young people by
stating that "healthy students make better learners, and better
learners make better communities." Hawaii's school health slogan,
"Healthy Keiki, Healthy Hawaii," reflects a continued focus on
doing what matters for the well-being of children and doing it well.
Authors: Jo Anne Grunbaum; Laura Kann; Steven A Kinchen; Barbara Williams; James G Ross; Richard Lowry; Lloyd Kolbe Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2002-06-28