Literature DB >> 15634030

Pharmacokinetics following intraventricular administration of chemotherapy in patients with neoplastic meningitis.

Gudrun Fleischhack1, Ulrich Jaehde, Udo Bode.   

Abstract

Intraventricular administration of chemotherapy is one approach to overcoming the limited distribution of anticancer drugs and their active metabolites into the CNS. This form of regional chemotherapy has led to effective treatment of occult and overt meningeal leukaemia in humans. In contrast, the efficacy of this therapy is extremely limited in the treatment of leptomeningeal dissemination of various solid tumours. Pharmacokinetic studies of the commonly intraventricularly applied anticancer agents in humans have demonstrated that, using low drug doses, very high drug concentrations can be achieved in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and relatively high concentrations in the leptomeninges but not in the brain tissue and the plasma. Therefore, this approach is not an effective treatment for bulky disease of brain tissue, and results in minimal systemic toxicity. In comparison with intralumbar administration, lower interpatient variability of CSF drug concentrations and improved clinical efficacy were observed. 'Concentration x time' schedules, i.e. frequent small drug doses over a short period, enable long-term CSF exposure to cytotoxic drug concentrations while avoiding excessively high and potentially neurotoxic drug concentrations. The technique of ventriculolumbar cerebrospinal perfusion delivers continuously high drug concentrations throughout the CSF for several hours, but its widespread use is limited by the technical complexities of this approach. In this article, the dosages, schedules and pharmacokinetic data of routinely used intraventricular agents in humans, e.g. methotrexate, cytarabine, glucocorticoids and thiotepa, are outlined in detail. In addition, pharmacokinetic data of investigational agents for intraventricular administration (diaziquone, DTC 101, mercaptopurine, mafosfamide, etoposide, topotecan, nimustine [ACNU] and bleomycin) are presented. Better understanding of the CSF pharmacology of these drugs is an essential prerequisite for safe, effective administration of these drugs. Investigational efforts are underway to verify the feasibility and efficacy of different dosages, schedules and combination therapies of these new intra-CSF agents. Current and future clinical research should also focus on methods allowing the delivery of tumoricidal drug concentrations for extended periods into the CSF and the brain tissue while minimising neurotoxicity and systemic toxicity (e.g. liposomal drug preparations, monoclonal antibodies, immunotoxins and gene therapy).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15634030     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200544010-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  161 in total

1.  Recurrent primary central nervous system lymphoma complicated by lymphomatous meningitis.

Authors:  M C Chamberlain; P Kormanik; M Glantz
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Effects of high-dose cytarabine.

Authors:  K R Hande; R S Stein; D A McDonough; F A Greco; S N Wolff
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Extended CSF cytarabine exposure following intrathecal administration of DTC 101.

Authors:  S Kim; E Chatelut; J C Kim; S B Howell; C Cates; P A Kormanik; M C Chamberlain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Central nervous system toxicity and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of intraventricularly administered bleomycin in beagles.

Authors:  V A Levin; D Byrd; B I Sikic; B B Etiz; J Campbell; J K Borcich; R L Davis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  New delivery systems for brain tumor therapy.

Authors:  E P Sipos; H Brem
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 6.  Central nervous system pharmacology of antileukemic drugs.

Authors:  F M Balis; D G Poplack
Journal:  Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  1989

7.  Effect of body position on ventricular CSF methotrexate concentration following intralumbar administration.

Authors:  S M Blaney; D G Poplack; K Godwin; C L McCully; R Murphy; F M Balis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Intrathecal melphalan therapy of human neoplastic meningitis in athymic nude rats.

Authors:  H S Friedman; G E Archer; R E McLendon; J M Schuster; O M Colvin; A Guaspari; R Blum; P A Savina; H E Fuchs; D D Bigner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Comparison of in vitro activity of epipodophyllotoxins with other chemotherapeutic agents in human medulloblastomas.

Authors:  F H Tomlinson; M G Lihou; P J Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Feasibility of intraventricular administration of etoposide in patients with metastatic brain tumours.

Authors:  G Fleischhack; S Reif; C Hasan; U Jaehde; S Hettmer; U Bode
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacology of drugs formulated with DepoFoam: a sustained release drug delivery system for parenteral administration using multivesicular liposome technology.

Authors:  Martin S Angst; David R Drover
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Neurotoxicity of intra-CSF liposomal cytarabine (DepoCyt) administered for the treatment of leptomeningeal metastases: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Marc C Chamberlain
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in children and adolescents following age-adapted dosing.

Authors:  Andreas Peyrl; Robert Sauermann; Monika Chocholous; Amedeo A Azizi; Walter Jäger; Martina Höferl; Irene Slavc
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Neoplastic meningitis resulting from hematological malignancies: pharmacokinetic considerations and maximizing outcome.

Authors:  Jai Grewal; Marlon Saria; Harpreet K Grewal; Santosh Kesari
Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)       Date:  2011-10

Review 5.  Intrathecal Antibacterial and Antifungal Therapies.

Authors:  Roland Nau; Claudia Blei; Helmut Eiffert
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention and management of central nervous system involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients by the Spanish Lymphoma Group (GELTAMO).

Authors:  Francisco-Javier Peñalver; Juan-Manuel Sancho; Adolfo de la Fuente; María-Teresa Olave; Alejandro Martín; Carlos Panizo; Elena Pérez; Antonio Salar; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 7.  Neoplastic meningitis from solid tumors: new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lombardi; Fable Zustovich; Patrizia Farina; Alessandro Della Puppa; Renzo Manara; Diego Cecchin; Antonella Brunello; Alessandro Cappetta; Vittorina Zagonel
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-07-27

Review 8.  Ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption for targeted drug delivery in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Muna Aryal; Costas D Arvanitis; Phillip M Alexander; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in children aged <3 years.

Authors:  Andreas Peyrl; Robert Sauermann; Friederike Traunmueller; Amedeo A Azizi; Mariella Gruber-Olipitz; Astrid Gupper; Irene Slavc
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Continuous intrathecal treatment with methotrexate via subcutaneous port: implication for leptomeningeal dissemination of malignant tumors.

Authors:  Nobusada Shinoura; Yusuke Tabei; Ryozi Yamada; Kuniaki Saito; Masamichi Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.