Literature DB >> 15633918

The concept of vulnerability in disaster research.

Carol Levine1.   

Abstract

The concept of vulnerability in research derives from a specific set of historical circumstances relating to abuses in biomedical research. Now so many people and groups have been labeled vulnerable that the concept has lost much of its force. In disaster research, participants should not be automatically considered vulnerable unless they are legally designated as such, for example, children. Instead specific aspects of the research should be thoroughly examined. Examples are the potential for the participants to be pressured to participate in several protocols, political or social turmoil surrounding the disaster, and cognitive impairments or mental health problems. In addition to a careful consent process, there should be procedures in place to provide assistance to participants who experience serious distress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15633918     DOI: 10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048952.81894.f3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Stress        ISSN: 0894-9867


  11 in total

1.  Vulnerable populations in research: the case of the seriously ill.

Authors:  Philip J Nickel
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2006

2.  Teaching Vulnerability in Research: A Study of Approaches Utilized by a Sample of Research Ethics Training Programs.

Authors:  Sana Loue; Bebe Loff
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Ethical considerations for vaccination programmes in acute humanitarian emergencies.

Authors:  Keymanthri Moodley; Kate Hardie; Michael J Selgelid; Ronald J Waldman; Peter Strebel; Helen Rees; David N Durrheim
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Reframing vulnerability: Mozambican refugees' access to state-funded pensions in rural South Africa.

Authors:  Enid J Schatz
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2009-01-14

5.  Secondary surge capacity: a framework for understanding long-term access to primary care for medically vulnerable populations in disaster recovery.

Authors:  Jennifer Davis Runkle; Amy Brock-Martin; Wilfried Karmaus; Erik R Svendsen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Institutional Review Board Preparedness for Disaster Research: a Practical Approach.

Authors:  Joan P Packenham; Richard Rosselli; Alice Fothergill; Julia Slutsman; Steve Ramsey; Janet E Hall; Aubrey Miller
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2021-05-11

7.  The Challenge of Timely, Responsive and Rigorous Ethics Review of Disaster Research: Views of Research Ethics Committee Members.

Authors:  Matthew Hunt; Catherine M Tansey; James Anderson; Renaud F Boulanger; Lisa Eckenwiler; John Pringle; Lisa Schwartz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A Systematic Review of Ebola Treatment Trials to Assess the Extent to Which They Adhere to Ethical Guidelines.

Authors:  Thomas Richardson; Andrew McDonald Johnston; Heather Draper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Ethical standards for mental health and psychosocial support research in emergencies: review of literature and current debates.

Authors:  Anna Chiumento; Atif Rahman; Lucy Frith; Leslie Snider; Wietse A Tol
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.185

10.  Familiar ethical issues amplified: how members of research ethics committees describe ethical distinctions between disaster and non-disaster research.

Authors:  Catherine M Tansey; James Anderson; Renaud F Boulanger; Lisa Eckenwiler; John Pringle; Lisa Schwartz; Matthew Hunt
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.