Literature DB >> 15633002

Factors influencing cardiac auscultation proficiency in physician trainees.

M Z C Lam1, T J Lee, P Y Boey, W F Ng, H W Hey, K Y Ho, P Y Cheong.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We assessed the accuracy of physician trainees in identifying different cardiac sounds and examined the factors influencing their cardiac auscultation proficiency.
METHODS: A total of 106 physicians in the Family Medicine Training Programme were asked to identify 10 cardiac sounds played sequentially on the Littmann electronic stethoscope, which functioned as a surrogate patient. Their auscultation accuracy was scored numerically out of a maximum of 10. Demographical data of the physicians was collected prospectively.
RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) auscultation proficiency score of the study population was 4.0 +/- 1.7. Physicians who graduated in 1994 or earlier fared significantly poorer than those who obtained their Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery degrees between 1995 and 2000 (p-value equals 0.02). Auscultation proficiency was not related to current practice, previous years of primary care, cardiology, internal medicine or paediatric medicine postings, or cumulative years of postings. Normal heart sounds were most accurately identified. Prosthetic cardiac sounds were better identified than other extra-cardiac sounds while systolic murmurs were more accurately identified than diastolic murmurs. Tachycardia had the lowest identification rate.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that cardiac auscultation skill declined with time, being significantly impaired eight years after graduation. We suggest that there is a need for retraining in the form of continuing medical education to address not only new knowledge and skills, but also basic skill competency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15633002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  6 in total

1.  Simulation-guided cardiac auscultation improves medical students' clinical skills: the Pavia pilot experience.

Authors:  Stefano Perlini; Francesco Salinaro; Paola Santalucia; Francesco Musca
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Comments on "The impact of SARS on medical house staff ...".

Authors:  Carolyn S P Lam; Crystal-Jing Yeo; Pak-Yean Cheong; Khek-Yu Ho
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Comparing the auscultatory accuracy of health care professionals using three different brands of stethoscopes on a simulator.

Authors:  Mansoor Mehmood; Hazem L Abu Grara; Joshua S Stewart; Faisal A Khasawneh
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-08-14

4.  Evaluating the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  David M Kronschnabl; Christoph Baerwald; Daisy E Rotzoll
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2021-09-15

5.  Simulation-based multiple-choice test assessment of clinical competence for large groups of medical students: a comparison of auscultation sound identification either with or without clinical context.

Authors:  Diem Quyen Nguyen; Jean Victor Patenaude; Robert Gagnon; Benoit Deligne; Isabelle Bouthillier
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2015-04-20

6.  The Effect of Signal Duration on the Classification of Heart Sounds: A Deep Learning Approach.

Authors:  Xinqi Bao; Yujia Xu; Ernest Nlandu Kamavuako
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.